Self-Rated Accuracy of Rating of Perceived Exertion-Based Load Prescription in Powerlifters. Issue 10 (October 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Self-Rated Accuracy of Rating of Perceived Exertion-Based Load Prescription in Powerlifters. Issue 10 (October 2017)
- Main Title:
- Self-Rated Accuracy of Rating of Perceived Exertion-Based Load Prescription in Powerlifters
- Authors:
- Helms, Eric R.
Brown, Scott R.
Cross, Matt R.
Storey, Adam
Cronin, John
Zourdos, Michael C. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Abstract: Helms, ER, Brown, SR, Cross, MR, Storey, A, Cronin, J, and Zourdos, MC. Self-rated accuracy of rating of perceived exertion-based load prescription in powerlifters. J Strength Cond Res 31(10): 2938–2943, 2017—This study assessed male ( n = 9) and female ( n = 3) powerlifters' (18–49 years) ability to select loads using the repetitions in reserve–based rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale for a single set for squat, bench press, and deadlift. Subjects trained 3× per week. For 3 weeks on nonconsecutive days in the weekly order of hypertrophy (8 repetitions at 8 RPE), power (2 repetitions at 8 RPE), and strength (3 repetitions at 9 RPE), using subject-selected loads intended to match the target RPE. Bench press and squat were performed every session and deadlift during strength and power only. Mean absolute RPE differences (|reported RPE—target RPE|) ranged from 0.22–0.44, with a mean of 0.33 ± 0.28 RPE. There were no significant RPE differences within lifts between sessions for squat or deadlift. However, bench press was closer to the target RPE for strength (0.15 ± 0.42 RPE) vs. power (−0.21 ± 0.35 RPE, p = 0.05). There were no significant differences within session between lifts for power and strength. However, bench press was closer (0.14 ± 0.44 RPE) to the target RPE than squat (−0.19 ± 0.21 RPE) during hypertrophy ( p = 0.02). Squat power was closer to the target RPE in week 3 (0.08 ± 0.29 RPE) vs. 1 (−0.46 ± 0.69 RPE, p = 0.03). It seems thatAbstract : Abstract: Helms, ER, Brown, SR, Cross, MR, Storey, A, Cronin, J, and Zourdos, MC. Self-rated accuracy of rating of perceived exertion-based load prescription in powerlifters. J Strength Cond Res 31(10): 2938–2943, 2017—This study assessed male ( n = 9) and female ( n = 3) powerlifters' (18–49 years) ability to select loads using the repetitions in reserve–based rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale for a single set for squat, bench press, and deadlift. Subjects trained 3× per week. For 3 weeks on nonconsecutive days in the weekly order of hypertrophy (8 repetitions at 8 RPE), power (2 repetitions at 8 RPE), and strength (3 repetitions at 9 RPE), using subject-selected loads intended to match the target RPE. Bench press and squat were performed every session and deadlift during strength and power only. Mean absolute RPE differences (|reported RPE—target RPE|) ranged from 0.22–0.44, with a mean of 0.33 ± 0.28 RPE. There were no significant RPE differences within lifts between sessions for squat or deadlift. However, bench press was closer to the target RPE for strength (0.15 ± 0.42 RPE) vs. power (−0.21 ± 0.35 RPE, p = 0.05). There were no significant differences within session between lifts for power and strength. However, bench press was closer (0.14 ± 0.44 RPE) to the target RPE than squat (−0.19 ± 0.21 RPE) during hypertrophy ( p = 0.02). Squat power was closer to the target RPE in week 3 (0.08 ± 0.29 RPE) vs. 1 (−0.46 ± 0.69 RPE, p = 0.03). It seems that powerlifters can accurately select loads to reach a prescribed RPE. However, accuracy for 8-repetition sets at 8 RPE may be better for bench press compared with squat. Rating squat power-type training may take 3 weeks to reach peak accuracy. Finally, bench press RPE accuracy seems better closer rather than further from failure (i.e., 3-repetition 9 RPE sets vs. 2-repetition 8 RPE sets). … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of strength and conditioning research. Volume 31:Issue 10(2017)
- Journal:
- Journal of strength and conditioning research
- Issue:
- Volume 31:Issue 10(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 31, Issue 10 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 31
- Issue:
- 10
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0031-0010-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2017-10
- Subjects:
- resistance training -- autoregulation -- powerlifting -- periodization
Physical education and training -- Periodicals
Weight training -- Physiological aspects -- Periodicals
Physical fitness -- Periodicals
613.7 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002097 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1064-8011
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5066.873700
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 8298.xml