Non-semantic contributions to "semantic" redundancy gain. Issue 8 (August 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Shepherdson, Peter; Miller, Jeff
• Is Part Of: Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. Volume 69:Issue 8(2016)
• Page Start: 1564
• Page End: 1582
• Publication Date: 2016-08
• Subjects: Redundancy gain -- Semantic processing -- Categorization -- Race model -- Coactivation; Psychology, Experimental -- Periodicals; Psychophysiology -- Periodicals; Psychology, Comparative -- Periodicals; 150.72405
• DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1088555
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1747-0218

Abstract

Recently, two groups of researchers have reported redundancy gains (enhanced performance with multiple, redundant targets) in tasks requiring semantic categorization. Here we report two experiments aimed at determining whether the gains found by one of these groups resulted from some form of semantic coactivation. We asked undergraduate psychology students to complete choice RT tasks requiring the semantic categorization of visually presented words, and compared performance with redundant targets from the same semantic category to performance with redundant targets from different semantic categories. If the redundancy gains resulted from the combination of information at a semantic level, they should have been greater in the former than the latter situation. However, our results showed no significant differences in redundancy gain (for latency and accuracy) between same-category and different-category conditions, despite gains appearing in both conditions. Thus, we suggest that redundancy gain in the semantic categorization task may result entirely from statistical facilitation or combination of information at non-semantic levels.