Comparing Delivery Approaches to Teaching Abnormal Psychology: Investigating Student Perceptions and Learning Outcomes. (November 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Goette, William F.; Delello, Julie A.; Schmitt, Andrew L.; Sullivan, Jeremy R.; Rangel, Angelica
• Is Part Of: Psychology, learning & teaching. Volume 16:Number 3(2017)
• Page Start: 336
• Page End: 352
• Publication Date: 2017-11
• Subjects: Blended -- online -- hybrid -- perceptions -- learning; Psychology -- Study and teaching (Higher) -- Great Britain -- Periodicals; 150.711
• DOI: 10.1177/1475725717716624
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1475-7257

Abstract

This study compares the academic performance and perceptions of 114 undergraduate students enrolled in an abnormal psychology course. Specifically, this study focuses on whether face-to-face (F2F) or blended modalities are associated with student learning outcomes. In this study, data analysis was based upon the examination of end-of-course grades, final exams, and an end-of-course survey. The data revealed that the same course presented in a F2F and a hybrid modality was associated with nearly identical learning outcomes in terms of student evaluations and final exam scores. However, students did note differences in course delivery in terms of time, assessment, and overall structure.