MP019: Systematic review of the management of lateral epicondylitis using transdermal nitroglycerin. (2nd June 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hunter, M.; Bhargava, A.; Lang, E.
• Is Part Of: CJEM. Volume 18(2016:Jan.)Supplement 1
• Page Start: S72
• Page End: S73
• Publication Date: 2016-06-02
• Subjects: lateral epicondylitis, -- nitroglycerin; Emergency Treatment -- Periodicals; Emergency Medicine -- Periodicals; Emergency medical services -- Canada -- Periodicals; Medical emergencies -- Canada -- Periodicals; Emergency medical services; Medical emergencies; Canada; Periodicals; 616.02505
• DOI: 10.1017/cem.2016.160
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1481-8035

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: Lateral epicondylitis (LE), also known as tennis elbow, is an overuse-underuse tendinopathy originating from the forearm extensor tendons of the elbow. An emerging therapy for the treatment of LE is the use of transdermal nitroglycerin (NTG) patches for pain relief and improved function. Our systematic review assesses 18 to 65 year old patients with clinically diagnosed LE and no structural damage or longstanding elbow injury to determine if transdermal NTG patches provide improved short term and long term pain relief as well as improved function in comparison with placebo.Methods: We included randomised controlled trials (RCT's) of NTG patch use versus placebo for the treatment of LE. Prospective comparison studies were also eligible for assessing the long term pain relief of NTG patch use. We performed a literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE, SportDiscus and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. English language articles were retrieved for review up to November 2015. Risk of bias within the studies was assessed regarding randomisation, allocation sequence concealment, blinding and selective outcome reporting.Results: Three RCT's were included that compared transdermal NTG patch use (two studies with 1.25mg/24h and one study comparing 0.72, 1.44 and 3.6mg/24h) versus a placebo to treat LE. One prospective comparison study of five years duration was included as a follow-up to one of the included RCT's to assess pain and function five years after the discontinuation of therapy. Data was not pooled because of heterogeneity in study methods and outcomes. The use of transdermal NTG patches provided short term pain relief (2-6 weeks for dosing of 0.72mg/24h or 1.25mg/24h) compared with placebo as suggested by three RCT's. Long term pain relief was improved by NTG patch use compared with placebo at six months in one RCT, but not at five years in a prospective comparison study. Function improved in two different RCT's with NTG patch use at 0.72mg/24h and 1.25mg/24h when compared to placebo. Five years after cessation of treatment, there was no difference between NTG patch and placebo.Conclusion: Overall, the included studies demonstrate that the use of NTG patches compared to placebo improves short term and long term pain relief, as well as elbow function. However, more studies are required to bridge the gaps between the existing studies and reduce heterogeneity between the study designs.