'Just turn to us': the persuasive features of contract cheating websites. Issue 4 (19th May 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rowland, Susan; Slade, Christine; Wong, Kai-Sheng; Whiting, Brooke
• Is Part Of: Assessment & evaluation in higher education. Volume 43:Issue 4(2018)
• Page Start: 652
• Page End: 665
• Publication Date: 2018-05-19
• Subjects: Contract cheating -- assessment -- integrity; Education, Higher -- Evaluation -- Periodicals; 378
• DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2017.1391948
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0260-2938

Abstract

Abstract: Academic integrity is important to universities and students must abide by codes of academic conduct around assessment. Students are, however, subject to multiple pressures around assessment, some of which can push them to cheat. Modern contract cheating websites are the fronts for sophisticated, commercial operations that offer individually written assessment items for a fee; to combat their use we need a better understanding of the tools they use to persuade students to become customers. In this study we examined the persuasive features of 11 highly-visible contract cheating websites and mapped these features to a previously used persuasiveness framework. We find that contract-cheating websites use a variety of credibility, interactive and informative features designed to persuade students to use their services. In addition, the sites offer low-cost, customisable products available in very short timeframes. We suggest ways in which educators can encourage academic integrity by talking with their students about how the websites promulgate their 'just turn to us' message.