Impacts of the Malawi social cash transfer program on household food and nutrition security. (April 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Brugh, Kristen; Angeles, Gustavo; Mvula, Peter; Tsoka, Maxton; Handa, Sudhanshu
• Is Part Of: Food policy. Volume 76(2018)
• Page Start: 19
• Page End: 32
• Publication Date: 2018-04
• Subjects: Food supply -- Periodicals; Food security -- Periodicals; Food -- Quality -- Periodicals; Food Supply -- Periodicals; Alimentation -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 338.1905
• DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.11.002
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0306-9192

Abstract

Highlights: A null program effect on total food expenditures masks other food security impacts. The Malawi SCTP is protective of diet quantity during the lean season. The SCTP increases meal frequency, caloric availability, and reduces the hunger gap. There is limited evidence that the program affects diet quality. The purchasing power of the cash transfer is critical during the lean season. Abstract: This study uses panel data for 3290 households to analyze the effect of an unconditional cash transfer on food and nutrition security among ultra-poor and vulnerable households. Study data are from an impact evaluation of the Government of Malawi's Social Cash Transfer Program, a cluster-randomized control trial that employs both random selection and random assignment. We use the difference-in-differences specification to estimate average treatment effects of the program on three components of food and nutrition security – current economic vulnerability, diet quantity, and diet quality. Results show protective program impacts during the lean season on diet quantity as beneficiary households are 11 percentage points more likely to consume multiple meals per day than control households ( p < .001 ), have a higher level of apparent caloric availability (267.49 kcal, p < .05 ), are 10 percentage points less likely to be food-energy deficient ( p < .05 ), and have a reduced hunger depth (111.11 kcal, p < .05 ). However, study findings indicate that after one year of program exposure beneficiary households have experienced little improvement in diet quality or current economic vulnerability to food insecurity. Clear policy and program implications emerge related to the purchasing power of the cash transfer, particularly during the lean season, and the importance of integrated social protection initiatives.