A connectionist model of the retreat from verb argument structure overgeneralization*. Issue 6 (16th November 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: AMBRIDGE, BEN; BLYTHING, RYAN P.
• Is Part Of: Journal of child language. Volume 43:Issue 6(2016)
• Page Start: 1245
• Page End: 1276
• Publication Date: 2015-11-16
• Subjects: Children -- Language -- Periodicals; 401.9305
• DOI: 10.1017/S0305000915000586
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0305-0009

Abstract

Abstract: A central question in language acquisition is how children build linguistic representations that allow them to generalize verbs from one construction to another (e.g., The boy gave a present to the girl → The boy gave the girl a present ), whilst appropriately constraining those generalizations to avoid non-adultlike errors (e.g., I said no to her → *I said her no ). Although a consensus is emerging that learners solve this problem using both statistical and semantics-based learning procedures (e.g., entrenchment, pre-emption, and semantic verb class formation), there currently exist few – if any – proposals for a learning model that combines these mechanisms. The present study used a connectionist model to test an account that argues for competition between constructions based on (a) verb-in construction frequency, (b) relevance of constructions for the speaker's intended message, and (c) fit between the fine-grained semantic properties of individual verbs and individual constructions. The model was able not only (a) to simulate the overall pattern of overgeneralization-then-retreat, but also (b) to use the semantics of novel verbs to predict their argument structure privileges (just as real learners do), and (c) to predict the pattern of by-verb grammaticality judgements observed in adult studies.