A new method to assess the influence of odor on food selection in dogs. Issue 1 (31st January 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pétel, C.; Baron, C.; Thomsen, M.; Callejon, L.; Péron, F.
• Is Part Of: Journal of sensory studies. Volume 33:Issue 1(2018)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2018-01-31
• Subjects: Sensory evaluation -- Periodicals; Food -- Sensory evaluation -- Periodicals; Food preferences -- Periodicals; 664.072
• DOI: 10.1111/joss.12311
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0887-8250

Abstract

Abstract: Previous research provides evidence that odor is a key driver in food selection in dogs. Dogs' flavor preferences are generally assessed through paired comparison tests based on food intake. Methods for evaluating odor preference in canines are lacking. In this study, the paired comparison test was modified by replacing standard bowls with false‐bottom bowls (FBBs). Made of two compartments separated by a drilled, stainless‐steel plate, FBBs enable odorant compounds to be placed under the food that is presented to the dogs. Several paired comparison trials were conducted on a trained canine panel with FBBs containing various odorant substances under the kibbles. Results showed that dogs were able to perceive the hidden substances and to distinguish between the bowls accordingly. These results demonstrate that the false‐bottom bowl paired comparison method could be helpful in evaluating the role of odor in dogs' food preferences, thus, also as a way of assessing food odor performance. Practical applications: The false‐bottom bowl method is an adaptation of the paired comparison test that enables the influence of odor on dog behavior to be isolated from that stimulated by vision, taste or textural parameters. The odor impact of a hidden substance is tested under pet meal conditions. This new method could be useful in pet food industry to measure the odor potential of a new ingredient, or to understand the key food selection drivers for dogs and cats. In addition, as the olfactory stimulus is not eaten by the animal, the influence of odor in non‐food products for dogs, such as pet care and pet medicines, could also be evaluated using this method.