Performance investigations on optimum mechanical design aspects of planar parallel manipulators. (18th May 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Singh, Yogesh; Santhakumar, M.
• Is Part Of: Advanced robotics. Volume 30:Number 10(2016)
• Page Start: 652
• Page End: 675
• Publication Date: 2016-05-18
• Subjects: Planar parallel manipulator -- kinematic analysis -- dynamic analysis -- manipulability -- isotropy -- optimum design -- stiffness; Robotics -- Periodicals; Robotics -- Japan -- Periodicals; Robotics; Japan; Periodicals; 629.89205
• DOI: 10.1080/01691864.2016.1144523
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0169-1864

Abstract

Abstract: This paper presents a comparative analysis of three degrees of freedom planar parallel robotic manipulators ( x, y and θ z motion platforms) namely 2PRP-PPR, 2PRR-PPR, 3PPR (Hybrid), 3PRP (Hephaist) and 3PPR U-base in terms of optimal kinematic design performance, static structural stiffness and dynamic performance (energy and power consumption). Kinematic and dynamic performance analyses of these platforms have been done using multibody dynamics software (namely ADAMS/View). Static stiffness of the above-mentioned manipulators have been analysed, compared using the conventional joint space Jacobian stiffness matrix method, and this method has been verified through a standard finite-element software (namely NASTRAN) as well. The size of the fixed base or aspect ratio (width/height) can be varied for various working conditions to understand its design parameters and optimal design aspects which are depending on the fixed base structure. Different aspect ratios (fixed base size) are considered for the comparative analyses of isotropy, manipulability and stiffness for the above-mentioned planar parallel manipulators. From the numerical simulation results, it is observed that the 2PRP-PPR manipulator is associated with a few favourable optimum design aspects such as singularity-free workspace, better manipulability, isotropy, higher stiffness and better dynamic performance in terms of power and energy requirement as compared to other planar parallel manipulators. Abstract :