Employable, committed, and thus well-performing: a matter of interdependent forward-looking social exchange. Issue 5 (3rd September 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Philippaers, Kristien; De Cuyper, Nele; Forrier, Anneleen
• Is Part Of: European journal of work and organizational psychology. Volume 26:Issue 5(2017)
• Page Start: 755
• Page End: 767
• Publication Date: 2017-09-03
• Subjects: Self-rated employability -- social exchange -- team commitment -- task performance -- altruism -- counterproductive work behaviour; Psychology, Industrial -- Periodicals; Organizational behavior -- Periodicals; Personnel management -- Europe -- Periodicals; Work -- Psychological aspects -- Periodicals; Psychology, Industrial -- Periodicals; Work -- psychology -- Periodicals; 158.7
• DOI: 10.1080/1359432X.2017.1351950
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1359-432X

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This study probes the relationship between perceived external employability (i.e., the individual's perception of available jobs on the external labour market) and affective commitment and performance within the framework of social exchange. An innovative feature is that we advance perceived external employability as a commodity of interdependent forward-looking exchange: employees who perceive themselves as externally employable anticipate successful exchange, which drives further responses, both relational (i.e., affective organizational commitment) and behavioural (i.e., performance). Strong features of this study are that we include (a) both the organization and the workgroup as foci of affective commitment, and (b) task, helping, and counterproductive behaviour as indicators of performance. Results from cross-lagged, structural equation modelling (SEM) analyses on two-wave survey data ( N = 458 Belgian employees) largely align with our idea: perceived external employability has a positive cross-lagged effect on affective organizational and workgroup commitment. The two foci of commitment in turn have a cross-lagged effect on performance, positive in the case of helping behaviour and negative in the case of counterproductive behaviour. No significant cross-lagged effects were found in relation to task behaviour. We discuss these results in the light of Social Exchange Theory and potential routes for future research.