Constructed‐Response DIF Evaluations for Mixed‐Format Tests. Issue 2 (December 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Moses, Tim; Liu, Jinghua; Tan, Adele; Deng, Weiling; Dorans, Neil J.
• Is Part Of: ETS research report series. Issue 2(2013:Dec.)
• Page Start: i
• Page End: 23
• Publication Date: 2013-12
• Subjects: constructed response -- differential item functioning -- DIF -- mixed‐format tests; Universities and colleges -- Entrance examinations; Universities and colleges -- Graduate work -- Examinations; Universities and colleges -- United States -- Entrance examinations; Universities and colleges -- United States -- Graduate work -- Examinations; Graduate Record Examination; Educational tests and measurements; Social sciences; Education -- Research; Education -- Research; Educational tests and measurements; Graduate Record Examination; Social sciences; Universities and colleges -- Entrance examinations; Universities and colleges -- Graduate work -- Examinations; United States; 378
• DOI: 10.1002/j.2333-8504.2013.tb02340.x
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2330-8516

Abstract

Abstract: In this study, differential item functioning (DIF) methods utilizing 14 different matching variables were applied to assess DIF in the constructed‐response (CR) items from 6 forms of 3 mixed‐format tests. Results suggested that the methods might produce distinct patterns of DIF results for different tests and testing programs, in that the DIF methods' results might be similar for tests with multiple‐choice (MC) and CR scores that are similar in their measurement characteristics but would exhibit larger variations for tests with MC and CR scores having more distinct measurement characteristics. Impact measures of the MC and CR scores appeared to be a useful basis for indicating the scores' measurement similarity, for predicting the variations of DIF results from using these scores as matching variables, and possibly for indicating the most appropriate DIF method and matching variable for a particular test. The results are described in terms of their implications for research and practice.