Multiscale evaluation from one bubble to the foam of surface active properties of cellulose derivatives used for a starchy model sponge cake. (October 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Huc-Mathis, D.; Bousquières, J.; Mamou, M.; Bonazzi, C.; Michon, C.
• Is Part Of: Food hydrocolloids. Volume 71(2017)
• Page Start: 129
• Page End: 140
• Publication Date: 2017-10
• Subjects: Cellulose -- Air/water interface -- Tensiometry -- Viscoelasticity -- Functional properties; Hydrocolloids -- Periodicals; Food additives -- Periodicals; Colloïdes -- Périodiques; Aliments -- Additifs -- Périodiques; Colloids; Food additives; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 664.06
• DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2017.03.038
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0268-005X

Abstract

Abstract: Interfacial properties of cellulose derivatives (HPMC and MC) were studied to understand their role in structuring a foam during the whipping process. Multiscale studies were performed to explain macroscopic observations with microscopic mechanisms. Results showed that HPMC was more flexible and had higher viscosity and shear-thinning properties than MC, which in turn diffused quicker to the interface due to a smaller molecular weight. Both hydrocolloids showed a good ability to stabilize interfaces through their surface tensions and dilatational moduli measured by static and dynamic tensiometry, respectively. However, only HPMC and HPMC + MC solutions were able to develop a stable foam. Methylcellulose formed more rigid interfaces and the interfacial elasticity was probably too high, leading to a difficult fractionation of bubbles. Moreover, its lower viscosity measured at low shear rate could explain its incapability to retain bubbles in the bulk just after their formation. HPMC and MC display complementarity and synergistic effects when used together, since a foam with much smaller bubbles is formed after only 2 min of whipping this mix. The bubble size was immediately smaller for solutions of HPMC + MC than for HPMC alone, with similar final air quantity. Finally, a hypothesis about the structuring mechanism of cellulose derivatives at air/water interfaces was proposed. MC would adsorb first at the interface and stabilize it but also increase its rigidity too much, hence its fragility against high mechanical stress. HPMC would come afterwards to the interface, but through its higher flexibility it would contribute to a higher resistance of the interface. Highlights: Static and dynamic tensiometry showed good interface stabilization by HPMC and MC. HPMC and HPMC + MC solutions were the only ones able to form a stable foam. MC had lower viscosity and shear-thinning properties while forming more rigid interfaces. A synergistic effect was shown for HPMC and MC in stabilizing foams.