An online intervention to increase physical activity: Self-regulatory possible selves and the moderating role of task self-efficacy. (July 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Strachan, Shaelyn M.; Marcotte, Meghan M.E.; Giller, Tara M.T.; Brunet, Jennifer; Schellenberg, Benjamin J.I.
• Is Part Of: Psychology of sport and exercise. Volume 31(2017)
• Page Start: 158
• Page End: 165
• Publication Date: 2017-07
• Subjects: Possible selves -- Physical activity -- Self-regulation -- Selfefficacy; Sports -- Psychological aspects -- Periodicals; Exercise -- Psychological aspects -- Periodicals; Psychology -- Periodicals; Sports -- Periodicals; Exercise -- Periodicals; Societies, Medical -- Periodicals; Psychology; Sports; Exercise; Societies, Medical; Sports -- Aspect psychologique -- Périodiques; Exercice -- Aspect psychologique -- Périodiques; 613.71019
• DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.05.001
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1469-0292

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: The act of reflecting on physically active possible selves can increase physical activity (PA). According to theory, possible selves that include strategies for achieving them (self-regulatory possible selves) should have the greatest impact on behavior. Our aim was to examine whether forming a self-regulatory physically active possible self is more effective at increasing PA than forming a possible self that focuses only on the image of the possible self (self-enhancing possible self) or engaging in a control activity. Task self-efficacy was examined as a moderator. Design: An online, randomized experimental study. Method: Insufficiently active adults (n = 244) completed task self-efficacy and PA measures before the intervention, and 4 and 8 weeks after. Results: Repeated measures ANOVA revealed a 'time by condition' interaction whereby reported PA levels were higher for participants in the self-enhancing condition than for those in the control condition 4 weeks post-intervention. Reported PA levels were also higher for participants in the self-regulatory condition than those in the control condition at both follow-up time points. There was also a 'time by condition by self-efficacy' interaction, whereby participants in the self-enhancing condition reported more PA than controls at both follow-up points when they also reported high self-efficacy. Participants in the self-regulatory condition reported more physical activity than all other participants when they were also low on self-efficacy, but only at the four-week follow-up point. Conclusion: The findings extend the PA possible selves literature by suggesting that different types of possible selves interventions may work best depending on participants' task self-efficacy levels. Highlights: We examined the effect of two possible selves interventions on physical activity. We examined baseline self-efficacy as an intervention moderator. Both interventions increased physical activity relative to control procedures. Self-efficacy moderated the effect of both interventions on physical activity.