Is disfluency desirable for learning?. (June 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Is disfluency desirable for learning?. (June 2017)
- Main Title:
- Is disfluency desirable for learning?
- Authors:
- Weissgerber, Sophia Christin
Reinhard, Marc-André - Abstract:
- Abstract: While some difficult learning conditions can improve learning, the findings regarding the contribution to learning of disfluent, hard-to-read text materials have been inconsistent. We identified test delay and disfluency manipulations as factors potentially contributing to these discrepancies. We tested students' immediate and delayed memory performance (2 weeks later) on a course text that was presented between-subjects ( N = 134) either as perceptually disfluent with a hard-to-read-font, as lexically disfluent with 20% scrambled letters, or in its original format. By distinguishing between short-term and long-term learning, our expectations were supported; an illegible font reduced forgetting, thereby producing delayed memory benefits. We also tested whether lexical disfluency would have similar memory effects as perceptual disfluency, as the meta-cognitive perspective suggests, or whether different disfluency manipulations would have different memory effects, as ideas from a contextualized framework on desirable difficulties suggests. The findings supported the latter. The results are discussed regarding the generalizability of the disfluency effects and the implications for when disfluency is desirable. Highlights: Different disfluency manipulations lead to similar meta-cognitive judgments. Memory outcomes were dissociated thereof and dissimilar for disfluency manipulations. An illegible font desirably improved long-term recall by decreasing forgetting.Abstract: While some difficult learning conditions can improve learning, the findings regarding the contribution to learning of disfluent, hard-to-read text materials have been inconsistent. We identified test delay and disfluency manipulations as factors potentially contributing to these discrepancies. We tested students' immediate and delayed memory performance (2 weeks later) on a course text that was presented between-subjects ( N = 134) either as perceptually disfluent with a hard-to-read-font, as lexically disfluent with 20% scrambled letters, or in its original format. By distinguishing between short-term and long-term learning, our expectations were supported; an illegible font reduced forgetting, thereby producing delayed memory benefits. We also tested whether lexical disfluency would have similar memory effects as perceptual disfluency, as the meta-cognitive perspective suggests, or whether different disfluency manipulations would have different memory effects, as ideas from a contextualized framework on desirable difficulties suggests. The findings supported the latter. The results are discussed regarding the generalizability of the disfluency effects and the implications for when disfluency is desirable. Highlights: Different disfluency manipulations lead to similar meta-cognitive judgments. Memory outcomes were dissociated thereof and dissimilar for disfluency manipulations. An illegible font desirably improved long-term recall by decreasing forgetting. Scrambled letters undesirably reduced short-term recall but tended to aid remembering. Manipulation and test time point are factors for disfluency's educational usefulness. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Learning and instruction. Volume 49(2017:Jun.)
- Journal:
- Learning and instruction
- Issue:
- Volume 49(2017:Jun.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 49 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 49
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0049-0000-0000
- Page Start:
- 199
- Page End:
- 217
- Publication Date:
- 2017-06
- Subjects:
- Desirable difficulties -- Disfluency -- Learning -- Memory -- Performance assessment
Learning -- Periodicals
Teaching -- Periodicals
Apprentissage -- Périodiques
Enseignement -- Périodiques
Learning
Teaching
Periodicals
Electronic journals
370.1 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09594752 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.02.004 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0959-4752
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5179.325890
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 1772.xml