P027: Nursing duties and accreditation standards and their impacts: the nursing perspective. (15th May 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jaggi, P.K.; Tomlinson, R.; McLelland, K.; Ma, W.; Manson-McLeod, C.; Bullard, M.
• Is Part Of: CJEM. Volume 19(2017:May)Supplement 1
• Page Start: S86
• Page End: S87
• Publication Date: 2017-05-15
• Subjects: nursing duties, -- accreditation standards, -- quality initiatives; Emergency Treatment -- Periodicals; Emergency Medicine -- Periodicals; Emergency medical services -- Canada -- Periodicals; Medical emergencies -- Canada -- Periodicals; Emergency medical services; Medical emergencies; Canada; Periodicals; 616.02505
• DOI: 10.1017/cem.2017.229
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1481-8035

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: With ongoing medical advances and an increase in elderly and complex patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED), there is a requirement for nurses to continue to gain new knowledge and skills to provide optimal patient care. Quality initiatives are frequently introduced with the goal of improving patient safety and the effectiveness of care delivery; some being provincial, while others are new requirements from Accreditation Canada. We sought the perspectives of emergency nurses regarding the importance of key ED processes and standards, and their impact on patient care and nurse efficiency.Methods: All Registered Nurses and Licensed Practical Nurses throughout the Edmonton Zone EDs were invited to complete an online survey consisting of 23 statements on nursing attitudes (10 on nursing duties) and beliefs (11 on the importance of Accreditation standards and their impacts; two that involved selecting the 5 most important nursing activities). The survey was constructed through an iterative approach. Response options included a 7-point Likert scale ('very strongly disagree' to 'very strongly agree'). Median scores and interquartile ranges were determined for each survey statement.Results: A total of 433/1241 (34.9%) surveys were submitted. Respondents were predominantly Registered Nurses (91.4%), female (88.9%), and worked 0-5 years overall in the ED (43.7%). Overall, respondents were favourable ('agree' or 'strongly agree') towards the Accreditation Canada standards and other quality initiatives. They were, however, 'neutral' towards universal domestic violence screening, and whether there is a difference between Best Possible Medication History (BPMH) and med reconciliation. The top five nursing activities in terms of perceived importance were: vital sign documentation, recording of allergies, listening to patients' concerns, hand hygiene, and obtaining a complete nursing history. Best Possible Medication History and the screening risk tools followed these.Conclusion: Despite their heavy workload, nurses strongly agreed on the importance of med reconciliation, falls risk, and skin care, but felt that improved documentation forms could support efficiency. Nursing perspective is valuable in informing future attempts to standardize, streamline, and simplify documentation, including the design and implementation of a provincial clinical information system.