Cross-Field Comparison of Ethics Education: Golden Rules and Particulars. (19th May 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mulhearn, Tyler J.; Watts, Logan L.; Torrence, Brett S.; Todd, E. Michelle; Turner, Megan R.; Connelly, Shane; Mumford, Michael D.
• Is Part Of: Accountability in research. Volume 24:Number 4(2017)
• Page Start: 211
• Page End: 224
• Publication Date: 2017-05-19
• Subjects: Cross field -- ethics education -- ethics training -- field differences -- responsible conduct of research; Research -- Evaluation -- Periodicals; Research -- Methodology -- Periodicals; Research -- Management -- Periodicals; 001.4
• DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2016.1274974
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0898-9621

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Research misconduct negatively impacts the scientific community and society in general. Providing training in the responsible conduct of research (RCR) to researchers is one viable approach to minimizing research misconduct. Although recent evidence suggests ethics training can indeed be effective, little empirical work has examined the similarities and differences across fields. In the present study, we analyzed 62 empirical studies in engineering, biomedical science, social science, and mixed fields. The findings suggest certain instructional principles, or "golden rules, " apply generally to all fields. These golden rules include maintaining a field-specific or field-general approach and emphasizing processes in training. The findings also suggest that content areas contributing to instructional effectiveness vary as a function of field. Generally, it appears that all fields may benefit from taking a multi-pronged approach to ethics education wherein the salient field issues are covered. Implications for RCR education are discussed.