Reconstructing with trace information: Does rapid identification information lead to better crime reconstructions?. Issue 1 (13th November 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: de Gruijter, Madeleine; de Poot, Christianne; Elffers, Henk
• Is Part Of: Journal of investigative psychology and offender profiling. Volume 14:Issue 1(2017:Jan.)
• Page Start: 88
• Page End: 103
• Publication Date: 2016-11-13
• Subjects: confirmation bias -- crime scene investigation -- identification information -- rapid identification technologies -- scenario construction; Criminal psychology -- Periodicals; Criminal behavior, Prediction of -- Periodicals; 365.3
• DOI: 10.1002/jip.1471
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1544-4759

Abstract

Abstract: Currently, promising new tools are under development that will enable crime scene investigators to analyze fingerprints or DNA‐traces at the crime scene. While these technologies could help to find a perpetrator early in the investigation, they may also strengthen confirmation bias when an incorrect scenario directs the investigation this early. In this study, 40 experienced Crime scene investigators (CSIs) investigated a mock crime scene to study the influence of rapid identification technologies on the investigation. This initial study shows that receiving identification information during the investigation results in more accurate scenarios. CSIs in general are not as much reconstructing the event that took place, but rather have a "who done it routine." Their focus is on finding perpetrator traces with the risk of missing important information at the start of the investigation. Furthermore, identification information was mostly integrated in their final scenarios when the results of the analysis matched their expectations. CSIs have the tendency to look for confirmation, but the technology has no influence on this tendency. CSIs should be made aware of the risks of this strategy as important offender information could be missed or innocent people could be wrongfully accused.