Input-driven differences in toddlers' perception of a disappearing phonological contrast. (2nd April 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: van der Feest, Suzanne V. H.; Johnson, Elizabeth K.
• Is Part Of: Language acquisition. Volume 23:Number 2(2016)
• Page Start: 89
• Page End: 111
• Publication Date: 2016-04-02
• Subjects: Language acquisition -- Periodicals; 401.9305
• DOI: 10.1080/10489223.2015.1047096
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1048-9223

Abstract

ABSTRACT: How does phonological development differ in children exposed to one versus two variants of a single language? If children receive mixed evidence for a phonological contrast (i.e., one language variant in the environment maintains a contrast while another neutralizes it), will they treat this contrast as noncontrastive (i.e., as allophonic)? Or will they learn that only some speakers maintain the contrast and use this information to strategically optimize online word recognition? We examine these issues in two groups of Dutch 24-month-olds. One group had exposure to a single variant of Dutch that devoices all fricatives; the other had exposure to two Dutch variants, only one of which devoices all fricatives. We find that children who receive mixed evidence for a phonological contrast rapidly adapt their signal processing strategies to suit different speakers. Moreover, children routinely exposed to only one language variant demonstrate similar capabilities if given time to adapt to an unfamiliar variant.