Can a systematic assessment moderation process assure the quality and integrity of assessment practice while supporting the professional development of casual academics?. Issue 3 (2nd April 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Crimmins, Gail; Nash, Gregory; Oprescu, Florin; Alla, Kristel; Brock, Ginna; Hickson-Jamieson, Bree; Noakes, Caitlin
• Is Part Of: Assessment & evaluation in higher education. Volume 41:Issue 3(2016)
• Page Start: 427
• Page End: 441
• Publication Date: 2016-04-02
• Subjects: TEQSA -- casual academic staff -- workforce development -- assessment moderation -- professional development; Education, Higher -- Evaluation -- Periodicals; 378
• DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1017754
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0260-2938

Abstract

Abstract : There has been a threefold increase in the employment of casual academics in Australian universities within the last 20 years, to the extent that most teaching and marking is now undertaken by casual academics, also known as sessional staff. Yet, casualised teaching and assessment has been considered a risk to student engagement and success, and casual academics report a lack of professional development and increased feelings of marginalisation within the academy. Concurrently, the quality assurance of teaching and assessment in higher education has become a central focus of the government-funded regulatory organisation, the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA). Situated within this context, we report on an assessment moderation process that could support casual academics' contextualised professional development, generate a sense of connectedness and collegiality and fulfil the requirements of TEQSA. Such processes may ensure that workforce growth in the higher education system supports a robust quality assurance and regulatory framework.