Detection of foodborne bacterial zoonoses by fluorescence in situ hybridization. (November 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rohde, Alexander; Hammerl, Jens Andre; Al Dahouk, Sascha
• Is Part Of: Food control. Volume 69(2016:Nov.)
• Page Start: 297
• Page End: 305
• Publication Date: 2016-11
• Subjects: Foodborne zoonoses -- Bacteria -- Fluorescence in situ hybridization -- FISH -- Detection -- Membrane filtration -- Campylobacter; Food -- Quality -- Periodicals; Food -- Analysis -- Periodicals; Food handling -- Periodicals; Food industry and trade -- Quality control -- Periodicals; Aliments -- Industrie et commerce -- Qualité -- Contrôle -- Périodiques; Aliments -- Qualité -- Périodiques; Aliments -- Analyse -- Périodiques; Hygiène alimentaire -- Périodiques; Food -- Analysis; Food handling; Food -- Quality; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 664.07
• DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.05.008
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0956-7135

Abstract

Abstract: The efficient and timely detection of bacterial pathogens remains a major public health concern throughout the world. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a promising tool to detect bacteria since it incorporates the advantages of rapid detection methods with the live/dead differentiation capacity of the gold standard culture methods. However, multiplexing pathogen detection, weak FISH signals and the establishment of a quantitative and sensitive direct enumeration approach remain troublesome obstacles for a widespread use in food microbiology. Therefore, we developed and tested a comprehensive set of highly specific multiplex-FISH tests for the simultaneous detection of various foodborne bacterial zoonoses, including important pathogens like Salmonella enterica, thermophilic Campylobacter and Listeria monocytogenes . The detection of thermophilic Campylobacter spp., the most frequent bacterial zoonosis in the EU, in artificially spiked chicken breast by FISH proved to be as sensitive as the conventional ISO standard, but results were available much earlier. Strongly enhanced FISH signals for Campylobacter spp., enabling detection in matrices with high background fluorescence, were accomplished by employing several probes for this target group. For the direct detection of bacteria, independent of cultural enrichment, filtration proved to be appropriate although this method is less sensitive and thus primarily suitable for higher bacterial loads. The type of membrane filter as well as the fluorescence channel significantly influenced the efficiency of detection. Furthermore, the implementation of GFP-expressing bacteria as a quantitative standard allowed the enumeration of target pathogens after filtration. In summary, our results demonstrate the applicability of FISH for food microbiology and offer new solutions for prevalent problems in FISH-testing. Highlights: FISH can be used for the simultaneous detection of various foodborne pathogens. Signals can be strongly enhanced by employing several probes for one target group. Filter-FISH is a suitable instrument for sample concentration and direct detection. Fluorescent bacteria can be used as internal quantification standards.