Item Calibration Samples and the Stability of Achievement Estimates and System Rankings: Another Look at the PISA Model. Issue 1 (2nd January 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rutkowski, Leslie; Rutkowski, David; Zhou, Yan
• Is Part Of: International journal of testing. Volume 16:Issue 1(2016)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 20
• Publication Date: 2016-01-02
• Subjects: achievement estimation -- cross-country comparability -- item parameter estimation -- PISA; Psychological tests -- Periodicals; Educational tests and measurements -- Periodicals; 150.28705
• DOI: 10.1080/15305058.2015.1036163
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1530-5058

Abstract

Abstract : Using an empirically-based simulation study, we show that typically used methods of choosing an item calibration sample have significant impacts on achievement bias and system rankings. We examine whether recent PISA accommodations, especially for lower performing participants, can mitigate some of this bias. Our findings indicate that standard operational methods, while not ideal, recover underlying proficiency reasonably well and generally outperform methods that more completely include all participants. Translating results onto the PISA scale, the calibration sample can induce bias of up to 12.49 points, which is important given that standard errors are around three points. Although ranking correlations are at least.95, we note the policy implications of slight ranking changes. Our findings indicate that limited accommodations targeted at low achieving educational systems do not outperform either of the other methods considered. Research that further explores accommodations for heterogeneous populations is recommended.