Visual attention accompanying food decision process: An alternative approach to choose the best models. (July 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gere, Attila; Danner, Lukas; de Antoni, Nino; Kovács, Sándor; Dürrschmid, Klaus; Sipos, László
• Is Part Of: Food quality and preference. Volume 51(2016:Jul.)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 7
• Publication Date: 2016-07
• Subjects: Gazing behavior and choice -- Eye-tracking of food products -- Comparison of prediction models -- Model ranking -- Sum of ranking differences; Food preferences -- Periodicals; Food -- Quality -- Periodicals; Food industry and trade -- Quality control -- Periodicals; Préférences alimentaires -- Périodiques; Aliments -- Qualité -- Périodiques; Aliments -- Industrie et commerce -- Qualité -- Contrôle -- Périodiques; Food industry and trade -- Quality control; Food preferences; Food -- Quality; Periodicals; 664
• DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.01.009
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0950-3293

Abstract

Highlights: Recording the gazing behavior and choice data of 6 product groups by eye-tracking. Predicting food choice using gazing behavior data and 13 prediction models. Comparison of prediction models using sum of ranking differences method. Models gave accurate predictions of choice. Sum of ranking differences suggested two models for prediction of food choice. Abstract: Visual attention plays an active role in food choice. During eye-tracking, several gazing behavior parameters are measured along with the consumer's choice. In this study, a Tobii T60 eye-tracker was used to record the gazing behavior of 59 participants during multi-alternative choice tasks (4AFC) in which pictures of six different food product groups (apples, salads, instant soups, sausages, soft drinks and beers) were presented. The aims of this study were (1) to investigate the relationship between gazing parameters and choice (2) to create prediction models based on gazing data and (3) identify the best model. The applied thirteen statistical models showed strong relationships between gazing behavior and choice and gave accurate predictions for choice. Sum of ranking differences method was used to rank the prediction models based on ten performance indicators. Iterative Dichotomiser 3 algorithm, Quinlan's C4.5 decision tree algorithm and k -Nearest Neighbor's algorithm showed the best performances in the cases of the separate product groups. After merging the data sets, Iterative Dichotomiser 3 algorithm showed clearly the best performance to describe the relationship between visual attention and food choice.