A cross-product category CBBE study: item response theory perspective. Issue 3 (13th May 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wang, Luming; Finn, Adam
• Is Part Of: Journal of product & brand management. Volume 23:Issue 3(2014)
• Page Start: 200
• Page End: 206
• Publication Date: 2014-05-13
• Subjects: New products -- Management -- Periodicals; New products -- Marketing -- Periodicals; Branding (Marketing) -- Periodicals; Advertising -- Brand name products -- Periodicals; 658.8
• DOI: 10.1108/JPBM-11-2013-0440
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1061-0421

Abstract

<abstract> <title> <x content-type="archive" xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec> <title content-type="abstract-heading">Purpose</title> <p> – The purpose of this study is to propose a new item response theory-based model to facilitate brand equity comparison among brands in different product categories. Brand equity has been defined as the value a brand adds upon a product. This definition provides the theoretical basis for comparing brands across product categories. Researchers have measured brand equity from three major approaches: finance, economics and psychology. Unlike the first two approaches that have developed methods to facilitate cross-product-category brand equity comparison, no methodology has been identified in the psychology approach (consumer-based brand equity, CBBE), and this study will fill this gap. </p> </sec> <sec> <title content-type="abstract-heading">Design/methodology/approach</title> <p> – We used survey method and collected data from both soft drink and car product categories to empirically demonstrate our method. </p> </sec> <sec> <title content-type="abstract-heading">Findings</title> <p> – A new item response theory-based model to facilitate brand equity comparison among brands in different product categories is proposed. </p> </sec> <sec> <title content-type="abstract-heading">Originality/value</title> <p> – Considering consumers are the most widely considered stakeholder group in the existing brand equity literature, the lack of cross-product category research in consumer-based brand equity (CBBE) area constrains the use of CBBE for firms managing multiple brands across product categories. This proposed model is the first one to address this limitation.</p> </sec> </abstract>