Efficiency of Several Cultural Methods and a Chick Bioassay to Recover Dry‐Stressed Campylobacter. Issue 1 (7th November 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Efficiency of Several Cultural Methods and a Chick Bioassay to Recover Dry‐Stressed Campylobacter. Issue 1 (7th November 2014)
- Main Title:
- Efficiency of Several Cultural Methods and a Chick Bioassay to Recover Dry‐Stressed Campylobacter
- Authors:
- Cox, N.A.
Richardson, L.J.
Harrison, M.A. - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="jfs12151-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <p> <italic>C</italic> <italic>ampylobacter</italic> can become viable but nonculturable (VBNC) when environments are unfavorable. The VBNC state arises from exposure to sublethal adverse environmental conditions and recovery occurs by passage of the organism through a susceptible host. This study evaluated the efficacy of five enrichment procedures for recovery of dry‐atmospheric‐temperature stressed <italic>C</italic><italic>ampylobacter jejuni</italic> and <italic>C</italic><italic>ampylobacter coli</italic> and determined viability using a chick bioassay. Sterile chick paper pads and filter papers were inoculated at a low (L) and high (H) inoculum levels. Inoculated samples were left at room temperature and exposed to atmospheric conditions for up to 24 h with sampling performed periodically. Recovery rate decreased gradually from 0 to 2 h and then sharply from 2 to 4 h. For the chick bioassay, negative dry‐stressed samples at 6 and 24 h post inoculation were administered orally and intracloacally to day‐of‐age chicks. Seven days post inoculation, the chicks' ceca were analyzed for marker strains. This is the first study to use the intracloacal route of chicks to determine viability.</p> </sec> <sec id="jfs12151-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Practical Applications</title> <p>The inability of conventional laboratory procedures to detect the presence of viable<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="jfs12151-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <p> <italic>C</italic> <italic>ampylobacter</italic> can become viable but nonculturable (VBNC) when environments are unfavorable. The VBNC state arises from exposure to sublethal adverse environmental conditions and recovery occurs by passage of the organism through a susceptible host. This study evaluated the efficacy of five enrichment procedures for recovery of dry‐atmospheric‐temperature stressed <italic>C</italic><italic>ampylobacter jejuni</italic> and <italic>C</italic><italic>ampylobacter coli</italic> and determined viability using a chick bioassay. Sterile chick paper pads and filter papers were inoculated at a low (L) and high (H) inoculum levels. Inoculated samples were left at room temperature and exposed to atmospheric conditions for up to 24 h with sampling performed periodically. Recovery rate decreased gradually from 0 to 2 h and then sharply from 2 to 4 h. For the chick bioassay, negative dry‐stressed samples at 6 and 24 h post inoculation were administered orally and intracloacally to day‐of‐age chicks. Seven days post inoculation, the chicks' ceca were analyzed for marker strains. This is the first study to use the intracloacal route of chicks to determine viability.</p> </sec> <sec id="jfs12151-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Practical Applications</title> <p>The inability of conventional laboratory procedures to detect the presence of viable nonculturable <italic>C</italic><italic>ampylobacter</italic> from dry samples has led scientists to misunderstand the ecology of this microorganism in the integrated poultry industry. For example, when <italic>C</italic><italic>ampylobacter</italic> are not detected in dry hatchery samples (eggshell, fluff, chick pads), it is erroneously assumed that they are not present rather than not culturable. Breeder flocks and fertile eggs are indeed a source of <italic>C</italic><italic>ampylobacter</italic> to the young chick, but this has been overlooked and disregarded due to the nonculturable state of this microorganism. This study may convince poultry scientists to frequently question their lab results and may allow us to better understand the ecology of this elusive organism.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of food safety. Volume 35:Issue 1(2015:Jan.)
- Journal:
- Journal of food safety
- Issue:
- Volume 35:Issue 1(2015:Jan.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 35, Issue 1 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 35
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0035-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 91
- Page End:
- 101
- Publication Date:
- 2014-11-07
- Subjects:
- Food adulteration and inspection -- Periodicals
Food contamination -- Periodicals
Food -- Analysis -- Periodicals
Food -- Microbiology -- Periodicals
Pathogenic bacteria -- Periodicals
Food handling -- Periodicals
Food preservatives -- Periodicals
664 - Journal URLs:
- http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1745-4565 ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/servlet/useragent?func=showIssues&code=jfs ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/loi/jfs ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/jfs.12151 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0149-6085
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4984.558000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3453.xml