Building Cohesion Across Representations: A Mechanism for STEM Integration. Issue 1 (16th April 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Building Cohesion Across Representations: A Mechanism for STEM Integration. Issue 1 (16th April 2013)
- Main Title:
- Building Cohesion Across Representations: A Mechanism for STEM Integration
- Authors:
- Nathan, Mitchell J.
Srisurichan, Rachaya
Walkington, Candace
Wolfgram, Matthew
Williams, Caro
Alibali, Martha W.
Johri, Aditya
Roth, Wolff‐Michael
Olds, Barbara M. - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="jee20000-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Purpose</title> <p>The mechanisms of integration of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) remain largely underspecified in the research and policy literatures, despite their purported benefits. Our novel claim is that one key mechanism of STEM integration is producing and maintaining <italic>cohesion</italic> of central concepts across the range of representations, objects, activities, and social structures in the engineering classroom.</p> </sec> <sec id="jee20000-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Method</title> <p>We analyze multiviewpoint videos of multiday classroom activities from Project Lead the Way (PLTW) classes in digital electronics in two urban high schools.</p> </sec> <sec id="jee20000-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>To forge cohesion, teachers use <italic>coordination</italic> of representations, tools, and materials, and they use <italic>projection</italic> to reference places and events, past and future. Teachers also perform explicit <italic>identification</italic> to label central invariant relations that are the conceptual focus of their instruction. Teachers typically perform identification, coordination, and projection on the particular STEM representations used in projects in order to improve the cohesion of the conceptual content of a curriculum unit. Teachers can also represent the larger sequence<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="jee20000-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Purpose</title> <p>The mechanisms of integration of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) remain largely underspecified in the research and policy literatures, despite their purported benefits. Our novel claim is that one key mechanism of STEM integration is producing and maintaining <italic>cohesion</italic> of central concepts across the range of representations, objects, activities, and social structures in the engineering classroom.</p> </sec> <sec id="jee20000-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Method</title> <p>We analyze multiviewpoint videos of multiday classroom activities from Project Lead the Way (PLTW) classes in digital electronics in two urban high schools.</p> </sec> <sec id="jee20000-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>To forge cohesion, teachers use <italic>coordination</italic> of representations, tools, and materials, and they use <italic>projection</italic> to reference places and events, past and future. Teachers also perform explicit <italic>identification</italic> to label central invariant relations that are the conceptual focus of their instruction. Teachers typically perform identification, coordination, and projection on the particular STEM representations used in projects in order to improve the cohesion of the conceptual content of a curriculum unit. Teachers can also represent the larger sequence of project activities within the curriculum to construct a cohesive account of how the various activities and representations relate and build upon key ideas.</p> </sec> <sec id="jee20000-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>This paper found that cohesion‐producing activities promote student understanding by threading conceptual relations through different mathematical representations, scientific laws, technological objects, engineering designs, learning spaces, and social structures. In these ways, cohesion can promote STEM integration in the engineering classroom.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of engineering education. Volume 102:Issue 1(2013:Jan.)
- Journal:
- Journal of engineering education
- Issue:
- Volume 102:Issue 1(2013:Jan.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 102, Issue 1 (2013)
- Year:
- 2013
- Volume:
- 102
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2013-0102-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 77
- Page End:
- 116
- Publication Date:
- 2013-04-16
- Subjects:
- Engineering -- Study and teaching (Higher) -- Periodicals
620.00711 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2168-9830 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
http://www.jee.org ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/jee.20000 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1069-4730
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4979.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3924.xml