Novel Approach to Ultrasound‐Guided Thoracostomy. (4th June 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Taylor, Lindsay A.; Stenberg, Robert; Tozer, Jordan; Vitto, Michael J.; Joyce, Michael; Jennings, Jason; Carpenter, Christopher L.; Fuchs, Robert; Deuell, Zachary; Evans, David P.
• Is Part Of: Journal of ultrasound in medicine. Volume 41:Number 3(2022)
• Page Start: 743
• Page End: 747
• Publication Date: 2021-06-04
• Subjects: clinical ultrasound -- pneumothorax -- point‐of‐care ultrasound -- thoracostomy -- trauma; Ultrasonics in medicine -- Periodicals; Ultrasonics; Ultrasonography; Ultrasonics in medicine; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Periodicals; 616.07543
• DOI: 10.1002/jum.15759
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0278-4297

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: Thoracostomy is often a required treatment in patients with thoracic trauma; however, performing a thoracostomy using traditional techniques can have complications. Ultrasound can be a beneficial tool for identifying the correct thoracostomy insertion site. We designed a randomized prospective study to assess if ultrasound guidance can improve thoracostomy site identification over traditional techniques. Methods: Emergency medicine residents were randomly assigned to use palpation or ultrasound to identify a safe insertion site for thoracostomy placement. The target population comprised of hemodynamically stable trauma patients who received an extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma (EFAST) and a chest computed tomography (CT) exam. The resident placed a radiopaque marker on the skin of the patient where a safe intercostal space was believed to be located, either by palpation or ultrasound. Clinical ultrasound faculty reviewed the CT to confirm marker placement relative to the diaphragm. A Fischer's exact test was used to analyze the groups. Results: One hundred and forty‐seven patients were enrolled in the study, 75 in the ultrasound group and 72 in the landmark group. This resulted in the placement of 271 total thoracostomy site markers, 142 by ultrasound and 129 by palpation and landmarks. The ultrasound group correctly identified thoracostomy insertion sites above the diaphragm in 97.2% (138/142) of patients, while the palpation group identified a safe insertion site in 88.4% (114/129) of patients ( P = .0073). Conclusion: This study found that emergency medicine residents are more likely to identify a safe tube thoracostomy insertion site in trauma patients by using ultrasound, as compared to using landmarks and palpation.