Simulating near‐field enhancement in transmission of airborne viruses with a quadrature‐based model. (23rd July 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Fierce, Laura; Robey, Alison J.; Hamilton, Cathrine
• Is Part Of: Indoor air. Volume 31:Number 6(2021)
• Page Start: 1843
• Page End: 1859
• Publication Date: 2021-07-23
• Subjects: aerosol modeling -- airborne transmission -- respiratory particles; Indoor air pollution -- Periodicals; Sick building syndrome -- Periodicals; Ventilation -- Periodicals; 613.5
• DOI: 10.1111/ina.12900
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0905-6947

Abstract

Abstract: Some infectious diseases, such as influenza, tuberculosis, and SARS‐CoV‐2, may be transmitted when virus‐laden particles expelled from an infectious person are inhaled by someone else, which is known as the airborne transmission route. These virus‐laden particles are more concentrated in the expiratory jet of an infectious person than elsewhere in a well‐mixed room, but this near‐field enhancement in virion exposure has not been well quantified. Transmission of airborne viruses depends on factors that are inherently variable and, in many cases, poorly constrained, and quantifying this uncertainty requires large ensembles of model simulations that span the variability in input parameters. However, models that are well‐suited to simulate the near‐field evolution of respiratory particles are also computationally expensive, which limits the exploration of parametric uncertainty. In order to perform many simulations that span the wide variability in factors governing airborne transmission, we developed the Quadrature‐based model of Respiratory Aerosol and Droplets (QuaRAD). QuaRAD is an efficient framework for simulating the evolution of virus‐laden particles after they are expelled from an infectious person, their deposition to the nasal cavity of a susceptible person, and the subsequent risk of initial infection. We simulated 10 000 scenarios to quantify the risk of initial infection by a particular virus, SARS‐CoV‐2. The predicted risk of infection was highly variable among scenarios and, in each scenario, was strongly enhanced near the infectious individual. In more than 50% of scenarios, the physical distancing needed to avoid near‐field enhancements in airborne transmission was beyond the recommended safe distance of two meters (six feet) if the infectious person is not wearing a mask, though this distance defining the near‐field extent was also highly variable among scenarios; the variability in the near‐field extent is explained predominantly by variability in expiration velocity. Our findings suggest that maintaining at least two meters of distance from an infectious person greatly reduces exposure to airborne virions; protections against airborne transmission, such as N95 respirators, should be available when distancing is not possible.