Juno‐UVS Observation of the Io Footprint During Solar Eclipse. Issue 7 (11th July 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hue, V.; Greathouse, T. K.; Bonfond, B.; Saur, J.; Gladstone, G. R.; Roth, L.; Davis, M. W.; Gérard, J.‐C.; Grodent, D. C.; Kammer, J. A.; Szalay, J. R.; Versteeg, M. H.; Bolton, S. J.; Connerney, J. E. P.; Levin, S. M.; Hinton, P. C.; Bagenal, F.
• Is Part Of: Journal of geophysical research. Volume 124:Issue 7(2019)
• Page Start: 5184
• Page End: 5199
• Publication Date: 2019-07-11
• Subjects: Io -- UV‐aurorae -- Jupiter -- Io footprint -- Io atmosphere -- Juno; Magnetospheric physics -- Periodicals; Space environment -- Periodicals; Cosmic physics -- Periodicals; Planets -- Atmospheres -- Periodicals; Heliosphere (Astrophysics) -- Periodicals; Geophysics -- Periodicals; 523.01
• DOI: 10.1029/2018JA026431
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2169-9380

Abstract

Abstract: The two main ultraviolet‐signatures resulting from the Io‐magnetosphere interaction are the local auroras on Io's atmosphere, and the Io footprints on Jupiter. We study here how Io's daily eclipses affect the footprint. Previous observations showed that its atmosphere collapses in eclipse. While remote observers can observe Io's local auroras briefly when Io disappears behind Jupiter, Juno is able to follow the Io footprint in the unlit hemisphere. Theoretical models of the variability of the energy flux fed into the Alfvén wings, ultimately powering the footprints, are not sufficiently constrained by observations. For the first time, we use observations of Io's footprint from the Ultraviolet Spectrograph (UVS) on Juno recorded as Io went into eclipse. We benchmark the trend of the footprint brightness using observations by UVS taken over Io's complete orbit and find that the footprint emitted power variation with Jupiter's rotation shows fairly consistent trends with previous observations. Two exploitable data sets provided measurements when Io was simultaneously in eclipse. No statistically significant changes were recorded as Io left and moved into eclipse, respectively, suggesting either that (i) Io's atmospheric densities within and outside eclipse are large enough to produce a saturated plasma interaction, that is, in the saturated state, changes in Io's atmospheric properties to first order do not control the total Alfvénic energy flux, (ii) the atmospheric collapse during the Juno observations was less than previously observed, or (iii) additional processes of the Alfvén wings in addition to the Poynting flux generated at Io control the footprint luminosity. Key Points: Juno‐UVS observed for the first time the Io footprints while Io went into eclipse The effect of Io's atmospheric collapse on the footprint emitted power is investigated No significant variation of the footprint emitted power is observed during eclipse