Pea Growth, Yield, and Quality in Different Crop Rotations and Cultural Practices. Issue 1 (25th April 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Pea Growth, Yield, and Quality in Different Crop Rotations and Cultural Practices. Issue 1 (25th April 2019)
- Main Title:
- Pea Growth, Yield, and Quality in Different Crop Rotations and Cultural Practices
- Authors:
- Sainju, Upendra M.
Lenssen, Andrew W.
Allen, Brett L.
Jabro, Jalal D.
Stevens, William B. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Core Ideas: Management strategies are lacking to enhance dryland pea growth, yield, and quality. Pea yield and quality were studied in various crop rotations and cultural practices. Pea yield and N uptake were greater with alternate‐year than stacked crop rotation. Stand count was greater with the improved than the traditional cultural practice. Alternate‐year rotation and improved cultural practice enhanced pea yield and quality. Dryland pea ( Pisum sativum L.) is an important pulse crop that can replace fallow or be added to existing crop rotations to sustain crop yields in arid and semiarid regions. Yet, we lack management practices to enhance yield and quality of dryland pea. This study evaluated the effect of crop rotation and cultural practices on dryland pea growth, yield, and quality from 2006 to 2011 in the northern Great Plains, USA. Stacked rotations were durum ( Triticum turgidum L.)–durum–canola ( Brassica napus L.)–pea (DDCP) and durum–durum–flax ( Linum usitatissimum L.)–pea (DDFP), and alternate‐year rotations were durum–canola–durum–pea (DCDP) and durum–flax–durum–pea (DFDP). Traditional cultural practice included a combination of conventional till, recommended seed rate, broadcast N fertilization, and reduced stubble height, and improved cultural practice a combination of no‐till, increased seed rate, banded N fertilization, and increased stubble height. Pea pod number, plant height, grain yield, and N uptake were 4 to 18% greater with DCDP andAbstract : Core Ideas: Management strategies are lacking to enhance dryland pea growth, yield, and quality. Pea yield and quality were studied in various crop rotations and cultural practices. Pea yield and N uptake were greater with alternate‐year than stacked crop rotation. Stand count was greater with the improved than the traditional cultural practice. Alternate‐year rotation and improved cultural practice enhanced pea yield and quality. Dryland pea ( Pisum sativum L.) is an important pulse crop that can replace fallow or be added to existing crop rotations to sustain crop yields in arid and semiarid regions. Yet, we lack management practices to enhance yield and quality of dryland pea. This study evaluated the effect of crop rotation and cultural practices on dryland pea growth, yield, and quality from 2006 to 2011 in the northern Great Plains, USA. Stacked rotations were durum ( Triticum turgidum L.)–durum–canola ( Brassica napus L.)–pea (DDCP) and durum–durum–flax ( Linum usitatissimum L.)–pea (DDFP), and alternate‐year rotations were durum–canola–durum–pea (DCDP) and durum–flax–durum–pea (DFDP). Traditional cultural practice included a combination of conventional till, recommended seed rate, broadcast N fertilization, and reduced stubble height, and improved cultural practice a combination of no‐till, increased seed rate, banded N fertilization, and increased stubble height. Pea pod number, plant height, grain yield, and N uptake were 4 to 18% greater with DCDP and DDCP than other rotations. Improved cultural practice increased stand count by 29% over traditional cultural practice. Biomass yield, N uptake, and grain protein concentration varied with crop rotations and cultural practices in various years. Seed number, seed weight, harvest index, and N harvest index were not influenced by treatments. Pea yield and N uptake increased with alternate‐year rotation due to increased pod number and plant height. Stand count increased with improved cultural practice. Alternate‐year crop rotations and improved cultural practice enhanced dryland pea yield and quality. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Agrosystems, geosciences & environment. Volume 2:Issue 1(2019)
- Journal:
- Agrosystems, geosciences & environment
- Issue:
- Volume 2:Issue 1(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 2, Issue 1 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 2
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0002-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 1
- Page End:
- 9
- Publication Date:
- 2019-04-25
- Subjects:
- Agriculture -- Periodicals
Agriculture -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals
Soil science -- Periodicals
Food science -- Periodicals
Food science
Agriculture
Agriculture -- Environmental aspects
Electronic journals
Periodicals
630 - Journal URLs:
- https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/26396696 ↗
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/age/tocs/1/1 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.2134/age2018.10.0041 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2639-6696
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 27129.xml