Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance heptamaloxyloglucan. (28th March 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Alvarez, Fernando; Arena, Maria; Auteri, Domenica; Castoldi, Anna Federica; Chiusolo, Arianna; Colagiorgi, Angelo; Colas, Mathilde; Crivellente, Federica; De Lentdecker, Chloe; Egsmose, Mark; Fait, Gabriella; Gouliarmou, Varvara; Ferilli, Franco; Ippolito, Alessio; Istace, Frederique; Jarrah, Samira; Kardassi, Dimitra; Kienzler, Aude; Lava, Roberto; Linguadoca, Alberto; Lythgo, Christopher; Magrans, Oriol; Mangas, Iris; Miron, Ileana; Molnar, Tunde; Padovani, Laura; Parra Morte, Juan Manuel; Serafimova, Rositsa; Sharp, Rachel; Szentes, Csaba; Terron, Andrea; Theobald, Anne; Tiramani, Manuela; Villamar‐Bouza, Laura;
• Is Part Of: EFSA journal. Volume 20:Number 3(2022)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2022-03-28
• Subjects: heptamaloxyloglucan -- peer review -- risk assessment -- pesticide -- elicitor -- protection against frost damage; Food -- Europe -- Safety measures -- Periodicals; Food Safety; Food -- Safety measures; Europe; Periodicals; Periodicals; Fulltext; Government Publications, International; Internet Resources; Periodicals; Periodicals; 363.19209405
• DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7210
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1831-4732

Abstract

Abstract: The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, France, and co‐rapporteur Member State, Spain, for the pesticide active substance heptamaloxyloglucan and the considerations as regards the inclusion of the substance in Annex IV of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/1659. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative use of heptamaloxyloglucan as a plant elicitor on grapevines for protection against frost damage (field use). The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are not identified.