Conservation risks and benefits of establishing monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) breeding habitats close to maize and soybean fields in the north central United States: A landscape‐scale analysis of the impact of foliar insecticide on nonmigratory monarch butterfly populations. (3rd May 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Grant, Tyler J.; Krishnan, Niranjana; Bradbury, Steven P.
• Is Part Of: Integrated environmental assessment and management. Volume 17:Number 5(2021)
• Page Start: 989
• Page End: 1002
• Publication Date: 2021-05-03
• Subjects: Agroecosystems -- Insect conservation -- Landscape‐scale risk assessment -- Pesticide toxicology -- Population sinks; Environmental management -- Periodicals; Pollution -- Periodicals; Environmental toxicology -- Periodicals; Environmental risk assessment -- Periodicals; Environmental impact analysis -- Periodicals; 628
• DOI: 10.1002/ieam.4402
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1551-3777

Abstract

Abstract: Establishing habitat in agricultural landscapes of the north central United States is critical to reversing the decline of North America's eastern monarch butterfly ( Danaus plexippus ) population. Insecticide use could create population sinks and threaten recovery. Discouraging habitat establishment within a 38‐m zone around crop fields is a suggested risk mitigation measure. In Story County, Iowa, United States, this mitigation would discourage habitat establishment in 84% of roadsides and 38% of noncrop land. It is unclear if the conservation benefits from establishing habitat close to crop fields outweigh suppression of population growth owing to insecticide exposure. Consequently, monarch conservation plans require spatially and temporally explicit landscape‐scale assessments. Using an agent‐based model that incorporates female monarch movement and egg laying, the number and location of eggs laid in Story County were simulated for four habitat scenarios: current condition, maximum new establishment, moderate establishment, and moderate establishment only outside a 38‐m no‐plant zone around crop fields. A demographic model incorporated mortality from natural causes and insecticide exposure to simulate adult monarch production over 10 years. Assuming no insecticide exposure, simulated adult production increased 24.7% and 9.3%, respectively, with maximum and moderate habitat establishment and no planting restrictions. A 3.5% increase was simulated assuming moderate habitat establishment with a 38‐m planting restriction. Impacts on adult production were simulated for six representative insecticides registered for soybean aphid ( Aphis glycines ) management. Depending on the frequency of insecticide applications over a 10‐year period, simulated production increased 8.2%–9.3%, assuming moderate habitat establishment with no planting restrictions. Results suggest that the benefits of establishing habitat close to crop fields outweigh the adverse effects of insecticide spray drift; that is, metapopulation extirpation is not a concern for monarchs. These findings are only applicable to species that move at spatial scales greater than the scale of potential spray‐drift impacts. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2021;17:989–1002. © 2021 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC). KEY POINTS: High mortality rates of monarch butterflies exposed to insecticides has created concern about new habitat establishment near agricultural fields. We asked the question: Is new milkweed established within 38 m of agricultural fields a population sink for monarch butterflies? We combined an agent‐based model, a new statistical method to estimate natural survival, and laboratory‐derived mortality estimates into a demographic model to simulate monarch production at the landscape scale. Under representative insecticide spray regimes, our simulations predict that establishing new habitat within 38 m of agricultural fields always has a net benefit to the monarch butterfly population.