Why do we have so many different hydrological models? A review based on the case of Switzerland. (14th December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Horton, Pascal; Schaefli, Bettina; Kauzlaric, Martina
• Is Part Of: Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Volume 9:Number 1(2022)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2021-12-14
• Subjects: alpine processes -- diversity -- rainfall‐runoff -- streamflow models -- Switzerland; Hydrology -- Periodicals; 553.705
• DOI: 10.1002/wat2.1574
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2049-1948

Abstract

Abstract: Hydrology plays a central role in applied and fundamental environmental sciences, but it is well known to suffer from an overwhelming diversity of models, particularly to simulate streamflow. We discuss here in detail how such diversity did arise based on the example of Switzerland. The case study's relevance stems from the fact that Switzerland, despite being a small country, shows a variety of hydro‐climatological regimes, of water resources management challenges, and of hydrological research institutes that led to a model diversification that stands exemplary for the diversification that arose also at larger scales. Our analysis, based on literature review, personal inquiry, and an author survey, summarizes the main driving forces behind model diversification. We anticipate that this review not only helps researchers from other fields but in particular also the international hydrology community to understand why we have so many different streamflow models. This article is categorized under: Science of Water > Science of Water Science of Water > Hydrological Processes Science of Water > Methods Abstract : Hydrology plays a central role in applied and fundamental environmental sciences, but it is well known to suffer from an overwhelming diversity of models. We discuss here how such diversity did arise based on the example of Switzerland. Our analysis summarizes the main driving forces behind model diversification.