Uncertainty Quantification with Experts: Present Status and Research Needs. Issue 2 (24th February 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hanea, Anca M.; Hemming, Victoria; Nane, Gabriela F.
• Is Part Of: Risk analysis. Volume 42:Issue 2(2022)
• Page Start: 254
• Page End: 263
• Publication Date: 2021-02-24
• Subjects: CM -- expert elicitation protocols -- IDEA -- SHELF -- uncertainty quantification; Technology -- Risk assessment -- Periodicals; 658.403
• DOI: 10.1111/risa.13718
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0272-4332

Abstract

Abstract: Expert elicitation is deployed when data are absent or uninformative and critical decisions must be made. In designing an expert elicitation, most practitioners seek to achieve best practice while balancing practical constraints. The choices made influence the required time and effort investment, the quality of the elicited data, experts' engagement, the defensibility of results, and the acceptability of resulting decisions. This piece outlines some of the common choices practitioners encounter when designing and conducting an elicitation. We discuss the evidence supporting these decisions and identify research gaps. This will hopefully allow practitioners to better navigate the literature, and will inspire the expert judgment research community to conduct well powered, replicable experiments that properly address the research gaps identified.