A markerless motion capture system can reliably determine peak trunk flexion while squatting with and without a weighted vest. (May 2023)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A markerless motion capture system can reliably determine peak trunk flexion while squatting with and without a weighted vest. (May 2023)
- Main Title:
- A markerless motion capture system can reliably determine peak trunk flexion while squatting with and without a weighted vest
- Authors:
- Andersen, J.T.
McCarthy, A.M.
Wills, J.A.
Fuller, J.T.
Lenton, G.K.
Doyle, T.L.A. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Markerless motion capture has improved physical screening efficiency in sport and occupational settings; however, reliability of kinematic measurements from commercial systems must be established. Further, the impact of torso-borne equipment on these measurements is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of HumanTrak, a markerless motion capture system, for estimating peak trunk flexion in squat movements with and without a weighted vest. Eighteen participants completed body weight squats (BWSQ) and overhead squats (OHSQ) to their maximum depth (unrestricted-range) and to a plyometric box (fixed-range) while wearing no body armour (NBA) or 9 kg body armour (BA9). Peak trunk flexion was measured using HumanTrak. Testing was performed in two sessions on one day (intra-day) and one session on a separate day (inter-day) to assess reliability. HumanTrak had a standard error of measurement < 3.74° across all movements and conditions. Reliability was good to excellent (ICC = 0.82–0.96) with very large to nearly perfect Pearson correlations ( r > 0.80) for all comparisons except unrestricted-range BWSQ with BA9 (ICC = 0.60–0.71, r = 0.71). HumanTrak was more reliable for intra- than inter-day, but reliability was still excellent for almost all inter-day comparisons (ICC > 0.82). HumanTrak is reliable for detecting differences in peak trunk flexion > 8.5° when body armour is not worn and > 10.5° when body armour is worn. Practitioners canAbstract: Markerless motion capture has improved physical screening efficiency in sport and occupational settings; however, reliability of kinematic measurements from commercial systems must be established. Further, the impact of torso-borne equipment on these measurements is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of HumanTrak, a markerless motion capture system, for estimating peak trunk flexion in squat movements with and without a weighted vest. Eighteen participants completed body weight squats (BWSQ) and overhead squats (OHSQ) to their maximum depth (unrestricted-range) and to a plyometric box (fixed-range) while wearing no body armour (NBA) or 9 kg body armour (BA9). Peak trunk flexion was measured using HumanTrak. Testing was performed in two sessions on one day (intra-day) and one session on a separate day (inter-day) to assess reliability. HumanTrak had a standard error of measurement < 3.74° across all movements and conditions. Reliability was good to excellent (ICC = 0.82–0.96) with very large to nearly perfect Pearson correlations ( r > 0.80) for all comparisons except unrestricted-range BWSQ with BA9 (ICC = 0.60–0.71, r = 0.71). HumanTrak was more reliable for intra- than inter-day, but reliability was still excellent for almost all inter-day comparisons (ICC > 0.82). HumanTrak is reliable for detecting differences in peak trunk flexion > 8.5° when body armour is not worn and > 10.5° when body armour is worn. Practitioners can assess meaningful changes in sagittal plane trunk motion when screening squat movements regardless of whether body armour is worn. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of biomechanics. Volume 152(2023)
- Journal:
- Journal of biomechanics
- Issue:
- Volume 152(2023)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 152, Issue 2023 (2023)
- Year:
- 2023
- Volume:
- 152
- Issue:
- 2023
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2023-0152-2023-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2023-05
- Subjects:
- Reliability -- Computer vision -- Kinematics -- Movement screening -- Military
Animal mechanics -- Periodicals
Biomechanics -- Periodicals
Biomechanics -- Periodicals
Mécanique animale -- Périodiques
Biomécanique -- Périodiques
Electronic journals
571.4305 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00219290 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/00219290 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/00219290 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111587 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0021-9290
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4953.600000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 27086.xml