Educational note: addressing special cases of bias that frequently occur in perinatal epidemiology. (25th December 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Neophytou, Andreas M; Kioumourtzoglou, Marianthi-Anna; Goin, Dana E; Darwin, Kristin C; Casey, Joan A
• Is Part Of: International journal of epidemiology. Volume 50:Number 1(2021)
• Page Start: 337
• Page End: 345
• Publication Date: 2020-12-25
• Subjects: Perinatal epidemiology -- fixed cohort bias -- conditioning on intermediates -- immortal time bias -- selection bias; Epidemiology -- Periodicals; 614.4
• DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyaa252
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0300-5771

Abstract

Abstract: The epidemiologic study of pregnancy and birth outcomes may be hindered by several unique and challenging issues. Pregnancy is a time-limited period in which severe cohort attrition takes place between conception and birth and adverse outcomes are complex and multi-factorial. Biases span those familiar to epidemiologists: selection, confounding and information biases. Specific challenges include conditioning on potential intermediates, how to treat race/ethnicity, and influential windows of prolonged, seasonal and potentially time-varying exposures. Researchers studying perinatal outcomes should be cognizant of the potential pitfalls due to these factors and address their implications with respect to formulating questions of interest, choice of an appropriate analysis approach and interpretations of findings given assumptions. In this article, we catalogue some of the more important potential sources of bias in perinatal epidemiology that have more recently gained attention in the literature, provide the epidemiologic context behind each issue and propose practices for dealing with each issue to the extent possible.