Subsequent pregnancy outcome after uterine compression suture placement for postpartum hemorrhage. Issue 3 (3rd May 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Subsequent pregnancy outcome after uterine compression suture placement for postpartum hemorrhage. Issue 3 (3rd May 2021)
- Main Title:
- Subsequent pregnancy outcome after uterine compression suture placement for postpartum hemorrhage
- Authors:
- Subbaiah, Murali
Chaturvedula, Latha
Kubera, Nichanahalli Siddappa
Raj, Ashwini - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the subsequent obstetrical outcome in women who received a uterine compression suture. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of women who received a uterine compression suture for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) between January 2009 and December 2018 and had a subsequent pregnancy at a tertiary care hospital in India. Women who had PPH but did not receive uterine compression sutures and had a subsequent pregnancy were taken as controls. Results: Sixty‐two women had a subsequent pregnancy after uterine compression suture and were included in this study. There were no significant differences in the subsequent pregnancy outcome between the study and control groups. However, women with a history of uterine compression suture were found to have a higher incidence of dense omental adhesions (15% versus 2.8%; P < 0.001), more intrapartum blood loss (740.5 ± 491.8 ml versus 638.8 ± 194 ml; P = 0.02), and were more likely to need repeat uterine compression suture (6.7% versus 0%; P = 0.004). Conclusion: Women who received uterine compression sutures had similar obstetrical outcomes in their subsequent pregnancy compared with those who did not receive a suture for PPH management. However, they had a higher risk of dense omental adhesions, repeat uterine compression suture application, and intrapartum blood loss. Abstract : Subsequent pregnancy outcome in women who received uterine compression sutures is good. However, they may have moreAbstract: Objective: To evaluate the subsequent obstetrical outcome in women who received a uterine compression suture. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of women who received a uterine compression suture for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) between January 2009 and December 2018 and had a subsequent pregnancy at a tertiary care hospital in India. Women who had PPH but did not receive uterine compression sutures and had a subsequent pregnancy were taken as controls. Results: Sixty‐two women had a subsequent pregnancy after uterine compression suture and were included in this study. There were no significant differences in the subsequent pregnancy outcome between the study and control groups. However, women with a history of uterine compression suture were found to have a higher incidence of dense omental adhesions (15% versus 2.8%; P < 0.001), more intrapartum blood loss (740.5 ± 491.8 ml versus 638.8 ± 194 ml; P = 0.02), and were more likely to need repeat uterine compression suture (6.7% versus 0%; P = 0.004). Conclusion: Women who received uterine compression sutures had similar obstetrical outcomes in their subsequent pregnancy compared with those who did not receive a suture for PPH management. However, they had a higher risk of dense omental adhesions, repeat uterine compression suture application, and intrapartum blood loss. Abstract : Subsequent pregnancy outcome in women who received uterine compression sutures is good. However, they may have more intrapartum blood loss. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics. Volume 156:Issue 3(2022)
- Journal:
- International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics
- Issue:
- Volume 156:Issue 3(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 156, Issue 3 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 156
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0156-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 475
- Page End:
- 480
- Publication Date:
- 2021-05-03
- Subjects:
- B‐Lynch suture -- Cho suture -- Hayman suture -- uterine compression suture -- uterine rupture
Gynecology -- Periodicals
Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Electronic journals
618 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/00207292 ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00207292 ↗
https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/18793479 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/ijgo.13710 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0020-7292
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4542.273000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 27105.xml