Benefit of rituximab maintenance is associated with Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index in patients with follicular lymphoma. Issue 2 (9th December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Li, Ru; Wang, Tingyu; Lyv, Rui; Wang, Yi; Yu, Ying; Yan, Yuting; Sun, Qi; Xiong, Wenjie; Liu, Wei; Sui, Weiwei; Huang, Wenyang; Wang, Huijun; Li, Chengwen; Wang, Jun; Zou, Dehui; An, Gang; Wang, Jianxiang; Qiu, Lugui; Yi, Shuhua
• Is Part Of: Blood science. Volume 5:Issue 2(2023)
• Page Start: 118
• Page End: 124
• Publication Date: 2022-12-09
• Subjects: Follicular lymphoma -- Follicular lymphoma international prognostic index -- Induction therapy -- Maintenance -- Progression-free survival -- Rituximab; Hematology -- Periodicals; Blood -- Periodicals; Hematology; Blood; Hematology; Blood; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 616.15005
• DOI: 10.1097/BS9.0000000000000144
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2543-6368

Abstract

Abstract : Rituximab maintenance (RM) prolongs the progression-free survival (PFS) of responding patients with follicular lymphoma (FL), but the maintenance efficacy in different Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) risk group is still confusing. We performed a retrospective analysis of the effect of RM treatments in patients with FL responding to induction therapy based on their FLIPI risk assessment carried out prior to treatment. We identified 93 patients between 2013 and 2019 who received RM every 3 months for ≥4 doses (RM group), and 60 patients who did not accept RM or received rituximab less than 4 doses (control group). After a median follow-up of 39 months, neither median overall survival (OS) nor PFS was reached for the entire population. The PFS was significantly prolonged in the RM group compared to the control group (median PFS NA vs 83.1 months, P = .00027). When the population was divided into the 3 FLIPI risk groups, the PFS differed significantly (4-year PFS rates, 97.5% vs 88.8% vs 72.3%, P = .01) according to group. There was no significant difference in PFS for FLIPI low-risk patients with RM compared to the control group (4-year PFS rates, 100% vs 93.8%, P = .23). However, the PFS of the RM group was significantly prolonged for FLIPI intermediate-risk (4-year PFS rates, 100% vs 70.3%, P = .00077) and high-risk patients (4-year PFS rates, 86.7% vs 57.1%, P = .023). These data suggest that standard RM significantly prolongs the PFS of patients assigned to intermediate- and high-risk FLIPI groups but not to low-risk FLIPI group, and pending larger-scale studies to validate.