Does fish growth respond to fishing restrictions within Marine Protected Areas? A case study of the striped red mullet in the south‐west Adriatic Sea (central Mediterranean). Issue 3 (20th February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Carbonara, Pierluigi; Ciccolella, Alessandro; De Franco, Francesco; Palmisano, Michele; Bellodi, Andrea; Lembo, Giuseppe; Neglia, Cosmidano; Spedicato, Maria Teresa; Zupa, Walter; Guidetti, Paolo
• Is Part Of: Aquatic conservation. Volume 32:Issue 3(2022)
• Page Start: 417
• Page End: 429
• Publication Date: 2022-02-20
• Subjects: back‐calculation -- Marine Protected Area -- Mediterranean Sea -- Mullus surmuletus -- otolith; Aquatic ecology -- Periodicals; Conservation of natural resources -- Periodicals; Aquatic resources -- Periodicals; 333.95216
• DOI: 10.1002/aqc.3776
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1052-7613

Abstract

Abstract: Some of the factors that influence fish growth are intrinsic (e.g. genetic and physiological), while others are environmentally driven (e.g. temperature, food availability). Growth, therefore, has biological but also ecological implications, as it is influenced by the environment in terms of energy flow. In this study, the growth patterns of the striped red mullet, Mullus surmuletus, inside the buffer zone of the Marine Protected Area (MPA) of Torre Guaceto and in two locations (Monopoli and Molfetta) outside the MPA were investigated in the south Adriatic Sea (central Mediterranean). The growth parameters for the female population fraction were estimated using the otolith back‐calculation technique: predicted asymptotic length (infinity) (TL∞ ) = 313.781 mm, growth coefficient (K) = 0.236 year −1 and prenatal length (t0 ) = −1.255 year for Molfetta; TL∞ = 342.988 mm, K = 0.173 year −1 and t0 = −1.828 year for Monopoli; TL∞ = 404.394 mm, K = 0.199 year −1 and t0 = −1.037 year for Torre Guaceto MPA. The results showed a significantly higher growth rate of female specimens of M. surmuletus, particularly 2 years and older, obtained from inside the MPA compared to those taken at the two outside locations. These findings suggest that fishing restrictions in the buffer zone of the MPA (where fish are more abundant and bigger) could be a more powerful driver for boosting individual fish growth than the mere 'density effect', which would have suggested lower growth rates associated with higher population densities.