DNA methylation biomarkers accurately detect esophageal cancer prior and post neoadjuvant chemoradiation. (20th January 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Macedo‐Silva, Catarina; Constâncio, Vera; Miranda‐Gonçalves, Vera; Leite‐Silva, Pedro; Salta, Sofia; Lobo, João; Guimarães, Rita; Carvalho‐Maia, Carina; Gigliano, Davide; Farinha, Mónica; Sousa, Olga; Henrique, Rui; Jerónimo, Carmen
• Is Part Of: Cancer medicine. Volume 12:Number 7(2023)
• Page Start: 8777
• Page End: 8788
• Publication Date: 2023-01-20
• Subjects: esophageal cancer -- liquid biopsies -- methylation biomarkers -- miRNAs -- neoadjuvant chemoradiation; 616.994005
• DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5623
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2045-7634

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Esophageal cancer (ECa) is associated with high mortality, mostly due to late diagnosis, precluding curativeintent surgery. Hence, neoadjuvant chemoradiation (ChRT) is recommended in most patients regardless of histological subtype. A proportion of these patients, however, achieve complete disease remission and might be spared of radical surgery. The lack of reliable, minimally invasive biomarkers able to detect post‐ChRT disease persistence is, nonetheless, a major drawback. We have previously shown that miRNA promotor methylation enables accurate cancer detection in tissues and liquid biopsies but has been seldom explored in ECa patients. Aims: Herein, we sought to unveil and validate novel candidate biomarkers able to detect ECa prior and post ChRT. Materials and Methods: Promoter methylation of miR129‐2, miR124‐3 and ZNF569 was assessed, using quantitative methylation‐specific PCR (qMSP), in tissue samples from normal esophagus, treatment‐naïve and post‐ChRT ECa, as well as in liquid biopsies from ECa patients. Results: All genes disclosed significantly different promoter methylation levels between ECa and normal esophagus, accurately detecting post‐ChRT disease, especially for adenocarcinoma. Remarkably, miR129‐2 me / ZNF569 me methylation panel identified ECa in liquid samples with 53% sensitivity and 87% specificity. Discussion: MiR129‐2 me, miR124‐3 me and ZNF569 me accurately discriminate ECa, either pre‐ or post‐ChRT, from normal tissue, enabling ECa detection. Furthermore, circulalting methylation‐based biomarkers are promising minimally invasive tools to detect post‐ChRT residual ECa. Conclusion: Overall, our results encourage the use of miRNA methylation biomarkers as accurate ECa detection tools as a novel approach for ChRT response monitoring. Abstract : Esophageal cancer methylation biomarkers as suitable tools to discriminate candidates for radical esophagectomy post neoadjuvant chemoradiation.