Family Perspectives on In-Home Multimodal Longitudinal Data Collection for Children Who Function Across the Developmental Spectrum. Issue 4 (14th May 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Boerner, Katelynn E.; Pearl-Dowler, Leora; Holsti, Liisa; Wharton, Marie-Noelle; Siden, Harold; Oberlander, Tim F.
• Is Part Of: Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics. Volume 44:Issue 4(2023)
• Page Start: e284
• Page End: e291
• Publication Date: 2023-05-14
• Subjects: patient engagement -- accessibility -- community-based data collection -- developmental pediatrics; Child development -- Periodicals; Developmental disabilities -- Periodicals; Behavior disorders in children -- Periodicals; Learning disabilities -- Periodicals; Child psychiatry -- Periodicals; 618.92805
• DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000001183
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0196-206X

Abstract

Abstract : This article has supplementary material on the web site: www.jdbp.org . Abstract: Objective: Quality child health research requires multimodal, multi-informant, longitudinal tools for data collection to ensure a holistic description of real-world health, function, and well-being. Although advances have been made, the design of these tools has not typically included community input from families with children whose function spans the developmental spectrum. Methods: We conducted 24 interviews to understand how children, youth, and their families think about in-home longitudinal data collection. We used examples of smartphone-based Ecological Momentary Assessment of everyday experiences, activity monitoring with an accelerometer, and salivary stress biomarker sampling to help elicit responses. The children and youth who were included had a range of conditions and experiences, including complex pain, autism spectrum disorder, cerebral palsy, and severe neurologic impairments. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis and descriptive statistics of quantifiable results. Results: Families described (1) the importance of flexibility and customization within the data collection process, (2) the opportunity for a reciprocal relationship with the research team; families inform the research priorities and the development of the protocol and also benefit from data being fed back to them, and (3) the possibility that this research approach would increase equity by offering accessible participation opportunities for families who might otherwise not be represented. Most families expressed interest in participating in in-home research opportunities, would find most methods discussed acceptable, and cited 2 weeks of data collection as feasible. Conclusion: Families described diverse areas of complexity that necessitate thoughtful adaptations to traditional research designs. There was considerable interest from families in active engagement in this process, particularly if they could benefit from data sharing. This feedback is being incorporated into pilot demonstration projects to iteratively codesign an accessible research platform.