Impact of COVID‐19 lockdowns on mental health: Evidence from a quasi‐natural experiment in England and Scotland. (12th November 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Serrano‐Alarcón, Manuel; Kentikelenis, Alexander; Mckee, Martin; Stuckler, David
• Is Part Of: Health economics. Volume 31:Number 2(2022)
• Page Start: 284
• Page End: 296
• Publication Date: 2021-11-12
• Subjects: COVID‐19 -- health -- health inequality -- lockdown -- mental health; Medical economics -- Periodicals; Economics, Medical -- Periodicals; Health Care Costs -- Periodicals; Health Policy -- economics -- Periodicals; Health Services -- economics -- Periodicals; 362.1
• DOI: 10.1002/hec.4453
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1057-9230

Abstract

Abstract: The COVID‐19 pandemic has been associated with worsening mental health but it is unclear whether this is a direct consequence of containment measures, like "Stay at Home" orders, or due to other considerations, such as fear and uncertainty about becoming infected. It is also unclear how responsive mental health is to a changing situation. Exploiting the different policy responses to COVID‐19 in England and Scotland and using a difference‐in‐difference analysis, we show that easing lockdown measures rapidly improves mental health. The results were driven by individuals with lower socioeconomic position, in terms of education or financial situation, who benefited more from the end of the strict lockdown, whereas they suffered a larger decline in mental health where the lockdown was extended. Overall, mental health appears to be more sensitive to the imposition of containment policies than to the evolution of the pandemic itself. As lockdown measures may continue to be necessary in the future, further efforts (both financial and mental health support) are required to minimize the consequences of COVID‐19 containment policies for mental health.