Influence of Zn2+ doping on the morphotropic phase boundary in lead‐free piezoelectric (1 – x)Na1/2Bi1/2TiO3‐xBaTiO3. Issue 2 (27th October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bremecker, Daniel; Lalitha, K. V.; Teuber, Siegfried; Koruza, Jurij; Rödel, Jürgen
• Is Part Of: Journal of the American Ceramic Society. Volume 105:Issue 2(2022)
• Page Start: 1232
• Page End: 1240
• Publication Date: 2021-10-27
• Subjects: lead‐free -- morphotropic phase boundary -- Na1/2Bi1/2TiO3‐xBaTiO3 -- piezoceramic -- Zn‐doping; Ceramics -- Periodicals; 620.1405
• DOI: 10.1111/jace.18186
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0002-7820

Abstract

Abstract: A series of morphotropic phase boundary (MPB) compositions of (1– x )Na1/2 Bi1/2 TiO3 ‐xBaTiO3 ( x = 0.05, 0.055, 0.06, 0.065, 0.07), with and without 0.5 mol% Zn‐doping was synthesized using the solid‐state route. The samples were characterized using X‐ray diffraction, dielectric analysis, and electromechanical measurements (piezoelectric d 33 coefficient, coupling factor k p, mechanical quality factor Q m, and internal bias field E bias ). The increase in the ferroelectric‐relaxor transition temperature upon Zn‐doping was accompanied by a shift of the MPB toward the Na1/2 Bi1/2 TiO3 ‐rich side of the phase diagram. Higher tetragonal phase fraction and increased tetragonal distortion were noted for Zn‐doped (1 – x )Na1/2 Bi1/2 TiO3 ‐ x BaTiO3 . In addition, ferroelectric hardening and the presence of an internal bias field ( E bias ) were observed for all doped compositions. The piezoelectric constant d 33 and the coupling coefficient k p decreased by up to ∼30%, while a 4‐ to 6‐fold increase in Q m was observed for the doped compositions. Apart from establishing a structure–property correlation, these results highlight the chemically induced shift of the phase diagram upon doping, which is a crucial factor in material selection for optimal performance and commercialization.