New Artificial Intelligence-Integrated Electromyography-Driven Robot Hand for Upper Extremity Rehabilitation of Patients With Stroke: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. (May 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Murakami, Yuhei; Honaga, Kaoru; Kono, Hidemi; Haruyama, Koshiro; Yamaguchi, Tomofumi; Tani, Mami; Isayama, Reina; Takakura, Tomokazu; Tanuma, Akira; Hatori, Kozo; Wada, Futoshi; Fujiwara, Toshiyuki
• Is Part Of: Neurorehabilitation & neural repair. Volume 37:Number 5(2023)
• Page Start: 298
• Page End: 306
• Publication Date: 2023-05
• Subjects: rehabilitation -- robotics -- upper extremity -- cerebrovascular disease -- hemiparesis; Nervous system -- Diseases -- Patients -- Rehabilitation -- Periodicals; Brain damage -- Patients -- Rehabilitation -- Periodicals; Spinal cord -- Wounds and injuries -- Patients -- Rehabilitation -- Periodicals; Nervous system -- Regeneration -- Periodicals; Neuroplasticity -- Periodicals; 616.804305
• DOI: 10.1177/15459683231166939
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1545-9683

Abstract

Background: An artificial intelligence (AI)-integrated electromyography (EMG)-driven robot hand was devised for upper extremity (UE) rehabilitation. This robot detects patients' intentions to perform finger extension and flexion based on the EMG activities of 3 forearm muscles. Objective: This study aimed to assess the effect of this robot in patients with chronic stroke. Methods: This was a single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial with a 4-week follow-up period. Twenty patients were assigned to the active (n = 11) and control (n = 9) groups. Patients in the active group received 40 minutes of active finger training with this robot twice a week for 4 weeks. Patients in the control group received passive finger training with the same robot. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of UE motor function (FMA), motor activity log-14 amount of use score (MAL-14 AOU), modified Ashworth scale (MAS), H reflex, and reciprocal inhibition were assessed before, post, and post-4 weeks (post-4w) of intervention. Results: FMA was significantly improved at both post ( P = .011) and post-4w ( P = .021) in the active group. The control group did not show significant improvement in FMA at the post. MAL-14 AOU was improved at the post in the active group ( P = .03). In the active group, there were significant improvements in wrist MAS at post ( P = .024) and post-4w ( P = .026). Conclusions: The AI-integrated EMG-driven robot improved UE motor function and spasticity, which persisted for 4 weeks. This robot hand might be useful for UE rehabilitation of patients with stroke. Clinical Trial Registry Name: The effect of robotic rehabilitation using XMM-HR2 for the paretic upper extremity among hemiparetic patients with stroke. Clinical Trial Registration-URL: https://jrct.niph.go.jp/ Unique Identifier: jRCTs032200045.