Ultrasound image-based deep learning to assist in diagnosing gross extrathyroidal extension thyroid cancer: a retrospective multicenter study. (April 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Qi, Qi; Huang, Xingzhi; Zhang, Yan; Cai, Shuangting; Liu, Zhaoyou; Qiu, Taorong; Cui, Zihan; Zhou, Aiyun; Yuan, Xinchun; Zhu, Wan; Min, Xiang; Wu, Yue; Wang, Weijia; Zhang, Chunquan; Xu, Pan
• Is Part Of: EClinicalMedicine. Volume 58(2023)
• Publication Date: 2023-04
• Subjects: Deep learning -- Gross extrathyroidal extension thyroid cancer -- Ultrasound; DL deep learning -- ETE extrathyroidal extension -- ROC receiver operating characteristic -- AUC area under the receiver operating characteristic curve -- RLN recurrent laryngeal nerve -- US ultrasound -- ResNet residual network -- FPN feature pyramid network -- RPN region proposal network -- ROI region of interest -- Grad-CAM gradient-weighted class activation mapping -- PPV positive predictive value -- NPV negative predictive value; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; Medical policy -- Periodicals; Clinical Medicine; Health Policy; Public Health; Medical policy; Medicine -- Research; Periodical; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 613
• DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101905
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2589-5370

Abstract

Summary: Background: The presence of gross extrathyroidal extension (ETE) in thyroid cancer will affect the prognosis of patients, but imaging examination cannot provide a reliable diagnosis for it. This study was conducted to develop a deep learning (DL) model for localization and evaluation of thyroid cancer nodules in ultrasound images before surgery for the presence of gross ETE. Methods: From January 2016 to December 2021 grayscale ultrasound images of 806 thyroid cancer nodules (4451 images) from 4 medical centers were retrospectively analyzed, including 517 no gross ETE nodules and 289 gross ETE nodules. 283 no gross ETE nodules and 158 gross ETE nodules were randomly selected from the internal dataset to form a training set and validation set (2914 images), and a multitask DL model was constructed for diagnosing gross ETE. In addition, the clinical model and the clinical and DL combined model were constructed. In the internal test set [974 images (139 no gross ETE nodules and 83 gross ETE nodules)] and the external test set [563 images (95 no gross ETE nodules and 48 gross ETE nodules)], the diagnostic performance of DL model was verified based on the pathological results. And then, compared the results with the diagnosis by 2 senior and 2 junior radiologists. Findings: In the internal test set, DL model demonstrated the highest AUC (0.91; 95% CI: 0.87, 0.96), which was significantly higher than that of two senior radiologists [(AUC, 0.78; 95% CI: 0.71, 0.85; P < 0.001) and (AUC, 0.76; 95% CI: 0.70, 0.83; P < 0.001)] and two juniors radiologists [(AUC, 0.65; 95% CI: 0.58, 0.73; P < 0.001) and (AUC, 0.69; 95% CI: 0.62, 0.77; P < 0.001)]. DL model was significantly higher than clinical model [(AUC, 0.84; 95% CI: 0.79, 0.89; P = 0.019)], but there was no significant difference between DL model and clinical and DL combined model [(AUC, 0.94; 95% CI: 0.91, 0.97; P = 0.143)]. In the external test set, DL model also demonstrated the highest AUC (0.88, 95% CI: 0.81, 0.94), which was significantly higher than that of one of senior radiologists [(AUC, 0.75; 95% CI: 0.66, 0.84; P = 0.008) and (AUC, 0.81; 95% CI: 0.72, 0.89; P = 0.152)] and two junior radiologists [(AUC, 0.72; 95% CI: 0.62, 0.81; P = 0.002) and (AUC, 0.67; 95 CI: 0.57, 0.77; P < 0.001]. There was no significant difference between DL model and clinical model [(AUC, 0.85; 95% CI: 0.79, 0.91; P = 0.516)] and clinical + DL model [(AUC, 0.92; 95% CI: 0.87, 0.96; P = 0.093)]. Using DL model, the diagnostic ability of two junior radiologists was significantly improved. Interpretation: The DL model based on ultrasound imaging is a simple and helpful tool for preoperative diagnosis of gross ETE thyroid cancer, and its diagnostic performance is equivalent to or even better than that of senior radiologists. Funding: Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation (20224BAB216079 ), the Key Research and Development Program of Jiangxi Province (20181BBG70031 ), and the Interdisciplinary Innovation Fund of Natural Science, Nanchang University (9167-28220007-YB2110 ).