Ex vivo evaluation of a technique for equine jejunocecal anastomosis using radiofrequency thermofusion and a Cushing oversew. Issue 4 (15th March 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gandini, Marco; Cerullo, Anna; Gallo, Livio; Iussich, Selina; Minoli, Lucia; Giusto, Gessica
• Is Part Of: Veterinary surgery. Volume 52:Issue 4(2023)
• Page Start: 545
• Page End: 553
• Publication Date: 2023-03-15
• Subjects: Veterinary surgery -- Periodicals; Veterinary Medicine -- Periodicals; Surgery -- Periodicals; Societies, Medical -- Periodicals; 636.0897
• DOI: 10.1111/vsu.13946
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0161-3499

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: To describe a technique for a side‐to‐side jejunocecal anastomosis in horses using radiofrequency thermofusion (TF) of the intestines supported by a Cushing oversew and to compare this anastomosis to handsewn and stapled techniques. Study design: Ex vivo study. Sample population: Intestinal tracts from 24 slaughtered horses. Methods: A radiofrequency device was used to perform a jejunocecal anastomosis (Group RFA). The construction time and bursting pressure of this construct were compared with those of a hand‐sewn double layer (Group HS) and stapled anastomoses (Group ST) without oversew of the staple line. Histology was also performed for the TF anastomoses to evaluate the extent of the thermal damage. Results: The median (range) construction time (min) for the TF (15.8 [14.4‐16.8]) was not significantly different from that for the HS (25.5 [24.2‐26.3]) and ST (10.8 [9.7‐12.5]) groups ( p = .07). The construction time for ST was shorter than that for HS group ( p < .001). The average (standard deviation) bursting pressure (mmHg) for HS (153.1 +/− 17.5) was higher than that for RFA (76 +/− 15) and ST groups (48 +/− 13; p < .001). The bursting pressure of the RFA was higher than that of the ST anastomoses ( p = .001). The thermal damage caused by the device was within the suture oversew in the deeper layers, whereas it extended a few mm beyond the suture line in the serosa. Conclusion: Radiofrequency assisted anastomoses provide similar construction times to current techniques and have a higher bursting pressure than ST anastomoses. Clinical significance: Radiofrequency‐assisted anastomoses with a suture oversew demonstrated comparable bursting pressures to ST anastomoses. The use of the radiofrequency device on the intestine is extra label and causes serosal tissue damage, which may increase the risk of adhesions.