Coalitionality shapes moral elevation: evidence from the U.S. Black Lives Matter protest and counter-protest movements. Issue 3 (29th March 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Holbrook, Colin; Fessler, Daniel M. T.; Sparks, Adam Maxwell; Johnson, Devin L.; Samore, Theodore; Reed, Lawrence I.
• Is Part Of: Royal Society open science. Volume 10:Issue 3(2023)
• Publication Date: 2023-03-29
• Subjects: prosociality -- emotion -- elevation -- coalitional psychology -- political orientation; Science -- Periodicals; 500
• DOI: 10.1098/rsos.220990
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2054-5703

Abstract

Abstract : Witnessing altruistic behaviour can elicit moral elevation, an emotion that motivates prosocial cooperation. This emotion is evoked more strongly when the observer anticipates that other people will be reciprocally cooperative. Coalitionality should therefore moderate feelings of elevation, as whether the observer shares the coalitional affiliation of those observed should influence the observer's assessment of the likelihood that the latter will cooperate with the observer. We examined this thesis in studies contemporaneous with the 2020 Black Lives Matter (BLM) protests. Although BLM protests were predominantly peaceful, they were depicted by conservative media as destructive and antisocial. In two large-scale, pre-registered online studies (total N = 2172), political orientation strongly moderated feelings of state elevation elicited by a video of a peaceful BLM protest (Studies 1 and 2) or a peaceful Back the Blue (BtB) counter-protest (Study 2). Political conservatism predicted less elevation following the BLM video and more elevation following the BtB video. Elevation elicited by the BLM video correlated with preferences to defund police, whereas elevation elicited by the BtB video correlated with preferences to increase police funding. These findings extend prior work on elevation into the area of prosocial cooperation in the context of coalitional conflict.