Physical Interpretation of Mixed Ionic‐electronic Conductive Polymer‐coated Electrodes by a Simple Universal Impedance Model. Issue 4 (7th November 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tintelott, Marcel; Kremers, Tom; Mernitz, Anabel; Ingebrandt, Sven; Pachauri, Vivek; Vu, Xuan Thang; Schnakenberg, Uwe
• Is Part Of: Electroanalysis. Volume 35:Issue 4(2023)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2022-11-07
• Subjects: electrochemical impedance spectroscopy -- liquid-solid interface -- modeling -- PEDOT : PSS -- PPy : PSS; Electrochemical analysis -- Periodicals; Chemistry, Analytical -- Periodicals; Electrochemistry -- Periodicals; 543.4
• DOI: 10.1002/elan.202200332
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1040-0397

Abstract

Abstract: A simple equivalent electrical circuit is used to obtain the physical parameters of electrical circuit elements from measured electrochemical impedance spectra. This model consists of four circuit elements with a clear physical meaning for each of the elements. Compared to complex models with multiple constant phase elements or Warburg impedances, our model is suitable for extracting physical values for important electrode parameters with low errors. The feasibility of the model was shown by investigating pure metal or polymer‐coated electrodes. Here, gold electrodes were coated either with Poly(3, 4‐ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT : PSS), Polypyrrole:poly(styrenesulfonate) (PPy : PSS), or (PEDOT/PPy) : PSS by means of electropolymerization. The model could demonstrate the ionic‐electronic differences such as the ion accessibility of the differently coated electrodes. To prove the correctness of the model, the obtained results were compared to the literature. Abstract :