JUGE: An infrastructure for benchmarking Java unit test generators. (20th December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Devroey, Xavier; Gambi, Alessio; Galeotti, Juan Pablo; Just, René; Kifetew, Fitsum; Panichella, Annibale; Panichella, Sebastiano
• Is Part Of: Software testing, verification & reliability. Volume 33:Number 3(2023)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2022-12-20
• Subjects: benchmarking -- evaluation infrastructure -- JUGE -- unit test generation; Computer software -- Testing -- Periodicals; Computer software -- Verification -- Periodicals; Computer software -- Reliability -- Periodicals; 005.14
• DOI: 10.1002/stvr.1838
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0960-0833

Abstract

Summary: Researchers and practitioners have designed and implemented various automated test case generators to support effective software testing. Such generators exist for various languages (e.g., Java, C#, or Python) and various platforms (e.g., desktop, web, or mobile applications). The generators exhibit varying effectiveness and efficiency, depending on the testing goals they aim to satisfy (e.g., unit‐testing of libraries versus system‐testing of entire applications) and the underlying techniques they implement. In this context, practitioners need to be able to compare different generators to identify the most suited one for their requirements, while researchers seek to identify future research directions. This can be achieved by systematically executing large‐scale evaluations of different generators. However, executing such empirical evaluations is not trivial and requires substantial effort to select appropriate benchmarks, setup the evaluation infrastructure, and collect and analyse the results. In this Software Note, we present our JUnit Generation Benchmarking Infrastructure (JUGE ) supporting generators (search‐based, random‐based, symbolic execution, etc.) seeking to automate the production of unit tests for various purposes (validation, regression testing, fault localization, etc.). The primary goal is to reduce the overall benchmarking effort, ease the comparison of several generators, and enhance the knowledge transfer between academia and industry by standardizing the evaluation and comparison process. Since 2013, several editions of a unit testing tool competition, co‐located with the Search‐Based Software Testing Workshop, have taken place where JUGE was used and evolved. As a result, an increasing amount of tools (over 10) from academia and industry have been evaluated on JUGE, matured over the years, and allowed the identification of future research directions. Based on the experience gained from the competitions, we discuss the expected impact of JUGE in improving the knowledge transfer on tools and approaches for test generation between academia and industry. Indeed, the JUGE infrastructure demonstrated an implementation design that is flexible enough to enable the integration of additional unit test generation tools, which is practical for developers and allows researchers to experiment with new and advanced unit testing tools and approaches. Abstract : Researchers and practitioners have designed and implemented various automated test case generators, each exhibiting specific effectiveness and efficiency depending on their testing goal and underlying techniques. In this context, practitioners need to be able to compare different generators to identify the most suited one for their requirements, while researchers seek to identify future research directions. In this Software Note, we present our JUnit Generation Benchmarking Infrastructure (JUGE) supporting generators seeking to automate the production of unit tests for various purposes.