Systematic benchmark of ancient DNA read mapping. Issue 5 (8th April 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Systematic benchmark of ancient DNA read mapping. Issue 5 (8th April 2021)
- Main Title:
- Systematic benchmark of ancient DNA read mapping
- Authors:
- Oliva, Adrien
Tobler, Raymond
Cooper, Alan
Llamas, Bastien
Souilmi, Yassine - Abstract:
- Abstract: The current standard practice for assembling individual genomes involves mapping millions of short DNA sequences (also known as DNA 'reads') against a pre-constructed reference genome. Mapping vast amounts of short reads in a timely manner is a computationally challenging task that inevitably produces artefacts, including biases against alleles not found in the reference genome. This reference bias and other mapping artefacts are expected to be exacerbated in ancient DNA (aDNA) studies, which rely on the analysis of low quantities of damaged and very short DNA fragments (~30–80 bp). Nevertheless, the current gold-standard mapping strategies for aDNA studies have effectively remained unchanged for nearly a decade, during which time new software has emerged. In this study, we used simulated aDNA reads from three different human populations to benchmark the performance of 30 distinct mapping strategies implemented across four different read mapping software— BWA-aln, BWA-mem, NovoAlign and Bowtie2— and quantified the impact of reference bias in downstream population genetic analyses. We show that specific NovoAlign, BWA-aln and BWA-mem parameterizations achieve high mapping precision with low levels of reference bias, particularly after filtering out reads with low mapping qualities. However, unbiased NovoAlign results required the use of an IUPAC reference genome. While relevant only to aDNA projects where reference population data are available, the benefit of usingAbstract: The current standard practice for assembling individual genomes involves mapping millions of short DNA sequences (also known as DNA 'reads') against a pre-constructed reference genome. Mapping vast amounts of short reads in a timely manner is a computationally challenging task that inevitably produces artefacts, including biases against alleles not found in the reference genome. This reference bias and other mapping artefacts are expected to be exacerbated in ancient DNA (aDNA) studies, which rely on the analysis of low quantities of damaged and very short DNA fragments (~30–80 bp). Nevertheless, the current gold-standard mapping strategies for aDNA studies have effectively remained unchanged for nearly a decade, during which time new software has emerged. In this study, we used simulated aDNA reads from three different human populations to benchmark the performance of 30 distinct mapping strategies implemented across four different read mapping software— BWA-aln, BWA-mem, NovoAlign and Bowtie2— and quantified the impact of reference bias in downstream population genetic analyses. We show that specific NovoAlign, BWA-aln and BWA-mem parameterizations achieve high mapping precision with low levels of reference bias, particularly after filtering out reads with low mapping qualities. However, unbiased NovoAlign results required the use of an IUPAC reference genome. While relevant only to aDNA projects where reference population data are available, the benefit of using an IUPAC reference demonstrates the value of incorporating population genetic information into the aDNA mapping process, echoing recent results based on graph genome representations. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Briefings in bioinformatics. Volume 22:Issue 5(2021)
- Journal:
- Briefings in bioinformatics
- Issue:
- Volume 22:Issue 5(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 22, Issue 5 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 22
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0022-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-04-08
- Subjects:
- ancient DNA -- alignment -- reference bias -- benchmarking
Genetics -- Data processing -- Periodicals
Molecular biology -- Data processing -- Periodicals
Genomes -- Data processing -- Periodicals
572.80285 - Journal URLs:
- http://bib.oxfordjournals.org ↗
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/content?genre=journal&issn=1477-4054 ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/bib/bbab076 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1467-5463
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2283.958363
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 26992.xml