Ultrafiltration‐induced decrease in relative blood volume is larger in hemodialysis patients with low specific blood volume: Results from a dialysate bolus administration study. Issue 2 (26th January 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Schmiedecker, Michael; Krenn, Simon; Waller, Maximilian; Paschen, Christopher; Mussnig, Sebastian; Niknam, Janosch; Wabel, Peter; Mayer, Christopher C.; Hecking, Manfred; Schneditz, Daniel
• Is Part Of: Hemodialysis international. Volume 27:Issue 2(2023)
• Page Start: 174
• Page End: 183
• Publication Date: 2023-01-26
• Subjects: blood volume -- chronic -- chronic kidney disease -- fluid status -- hemodialysis -- renal dialysis -- renal insufficiency; Hemodialysis -- Periodicals; Renal Dialysis -- Periodicals; Renal Dialysis -- Congresses; Hemodialysis, Home -- Congresses; 617.461059
• DOI: 10.1111/hdi.13066
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1492-7535

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Prescribing the ultrafiltration in hemodialysis patients remains challenging and might benefit from the information on absolute blood volume, estimated by intradialytic dialysate bolus administration. Here, we aimed at determining the relationship between absolute blood volume, normalized for body mass (specific blood volume, Vs), and ultrafiltration‐induced decrease in relative blood volume (∆RBV) as well as clinical parameters including body mass index (BMI). Methods: This retrospective analysis comprised 77 patients who had their dialysate bolus‐based absolute blood volume extracted routinely with an automated method. Patient‐specific characteristics and ∆RBV were analyzed as a function of Vs, dichotomizing the data above or below a previously proposed threshold of 65 ml/kg for Vs. Statistical methodology comprised descriptive analyses, two‐group comparisons, and correlation analyses. Findings: Median Vs was 68.6 ml/kg (54.9 ml/kg [Quartile 1], 83.4 ml/kg [Quartile 3]). Relative blood volume decreased by 6.3% (2.6%, 12.2%) over the entire hemodialysis session. Vs correlated inversely with BMI (rs = −0.688, p < 0.001). ∆RBV was 9.8% in the group of patients with Vs <65 ml/kg versus 6.0% in the group of patients with Vs ≥65 ml/kg ( p = 0.024). The two groups did not differ significantly regarding their specific ultrafiltration volume, normalized for body mass, which amounted to 34.1 ml/kg and 36.0 ml/kg in both groups, respectively ( p = 0.630). ∆RBV correlated inversely with Vs (rs = −0.299, p = 0.008). Discussion: The present study suggests that patients with higher BMI and lower Vs experience larger blood volume changes, despite similar ultrafiltration requirements. These results underline the clinical plausibility and importance of dialysate bolus‐based absolute blood volume determination in the assessment of target weight, especially in view of a previous study where intradialytic morbid events could be decreased when the target weight was adjusted, based on Vs.